Search for: "Davis v. THE STATE"
Results 3361 - 3380
of 6,204
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jun 2018, 10:17 am
Davis, 17-6883. [read post]
9 Nov 2006, 5:17 pm
The elaboration that "the intent of a questioner is relevant only if it could affect a reasonable declarant's expectations" is, I think, the best way of making sense of a rather confusing aspect of the opinion in Davis v. [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 3:09 am
" "In opposition, the plaintiff has failed to demonstrate that the Horn and Sager defendants committed malpractice by allegedly not calling the plaintiffs CPA as a witness, by advising him to enter into a modification of his March 12, 1999 child custody stipulation, or by failing to move to disqualify his former wife’s counsel (see generally Waggoner v Caruso, 14 NY3cl 874, 903 NYS2d 333 [2010]; Davis v Klein, 88 NY2d 1008, 648 NYS2d 871 [1996]). [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 6:15 am
In addition, the Court has rescheduled Davis v. [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 5:40 am
Ferguson v. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 6:00 am
Washington and Davis v. [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 10:20 am
No Pet Policy Does Not Violate State or Federal Fair Housing Acts Hawn v. [read post]
14 Jul 2021, 9:01 pm
In its 1989 decision in Rodriguez de Quijas v. [read post]
14 May 2020, 6:30 am
Davis’s trial ends because he receives a pardon; the Supreme Court eventually takes Lincoln’s side of the debate in Texas v. [read post]
11 Aug 2024, 12:25 pm
New Mexico (Confrontation Clause) Joined amicus brief of blue and red states in Davis v. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 9:51 am
” The timeframe for decision in Trump v. [read post]
9 Feb 2017, 3:42 pm
Zadvydas v. [read post]
17 Aug 2016, 11:34 am
Noting that Congress intended for the FLSA to apply broadly notwithstanding any overlap with other labor statutes, the Fourth Circuit found no conflict between the FLSA, the Davis-Bacon Act (DBA), and the Contract Work Hours and Safety Standards Act (CWHSSA). [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 7:29 am
Parke, Davis & Co. (1973) 9 Cal.3d 51, 62.) [read post]
21 Mar 2019, 6:54 am
In 1986, in a case called Batson v. [read post]
28 Dec 2007, 10:22 pm
Smith v. [read post]
23 Feb 2016, 4:10 am
This is the Court’s first exclusionary rule case since Davis v. [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 3:37 pm
IT-Davy, 74 S.W.3d 849, 853 (Tex. 2002). [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 4:56 pm
United States and Herring v. [read post]