Search for: "Doe, Appeal of" Results 3361 - 3380 of 107,977
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jan 2024, 10:43 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The Court of Appeals (Lohier, Robinson and Nathan) does not see it that way. [read post]
17 Jan 2024, 10:34 am by Jeffrey Randa
The law presumes an alcohol problem, but it does NOT presume that a person is some kind of raging alcoholic. [read post]
17 Jan 2024, 7:00 am by John McFarland
Hoffman, in the San Antonio Court of Appeals, No. 04-19-00771-CV. [read post]
17 Jan 2024, 6:51 am by Dan Bressler
” “We have previously advised that a judge’s obligations with respect to a former client remain the same whether that former client appears as a party or as an amicus curiae (see Opinion 18-46 [noting it “does not change the analysis”]). [read post]
17 Jan 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Further, prevailing at a name-clearing hearing does not entitle the individual to reinstatement or to reemployment in his or her former position. [read post]
17 Jan 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Further, prevailing at a name-clearing hearing does not entitle the individual to reinstatement or to reemployment in his or her former position. [read post]
17 Jan 2024, 4:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
              Brown likes Fung despite his eccentricities, but he does not wish to violate the law and risk a potential prison sentence or fine. [read post]
17 Jan 2024, 3:36 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
That said, defendants’ argument centers on the notion that plaintiffs had to prove that they could have obtained a stay pending an appeal of the May 2017 order in the bankruptcy proceeding and that they would have been successful on such appeal. [read post]
17 Jan 2024, 1:30 am by Jarrett Blakeley
Motorcycle accidents can be life-changing events, often leading to serious injuries or even fatalities. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 11:33 pm by Carol Holness (ZA)
Wrongful arrest does not require a party to prove that prosecution was instigated by the defendant and, similarly, malicious prosecution does not require a party to prove detention. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
On appeal, the Second Circuit first addressed whether PMI defrauded investors by claiming that its IQOS studies were conducted in accordance with GCP. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 1:19 pm by Kevin LaCroix
During the close-to-close trading sessions affected by a short report, defendant issuers’ stock price declined by 16.8%, on average, and incurred additional declines of 16.0% during the 90-day look-back period of Section 21D(e)(1) of the Private Securities and Litigation Reform Act.[3][4] Third, Rule 10b-5 private securities fraud lawsuits based primarily on activist short-seller research may not be indicative of actual fraud-on-the-market since the work product does not… [read post]