Search for: "Givens v. Givens"
Results 3361 - 3380
of 67,529
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jul 2015, 10:19 am
So we want the NSA to destroy the records and we've given them a clear path. [read post]
6 Aug 2013, 1:17 pm
Given the history of this case, the district court did not commit a clear error of judgment by sanctioning counsel for continuing to litigate meritless claims. [read post]
29 May 2013, 1:44 pm
The Appeals Court said, however, ". . .given that EPA has no obligation to recalculate the MACT floor when revising standards, see supra at 8–9, and given that section 112(d)(2) expressly authorizes cost consideration in other aspects of the standard-setting process, we believe this clear statement rule is satisfied." [read post]
27 Jan 2015, 8:59 am
While in some areas there may be a single point of law in which the treatise (or the restatement) simply gets it wrong, there are other areas where the treatise offers more flexibility.Restatements generally boil the law down to a single rule (or few) on a given topic. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 11:16 am
Walker In Alameda Books et al. v. [read post]
12 Mar 2019, 12:54 pm
Given the BC Government’s recent restrictions on expert evidence Justices will likely have increasingly fewer such reports to assist them. [read post]
17 Jul 2020, 4:24 am
The transcript of the evidence given on Day 7 is here. [read post]
6 Nov 2018, 8:41 am
Judgment was given on 30 Jul 2015. [read post]
11 Dec 2019, 10:54 am
Justice Thomas with opinion in Rotkiske v. [read post]
25 Nov 2014, 9:18 am
On November 13, 2014, the Third Appellate District in Earl v. [read post]
30 Aug 2013, 8:05 am
’ I say this only to emphasize that I am not particularly invested in the outcome of the ‘2 v. 3’ debate. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 7:45 pm
See Whitney v. [read post]
3 Sep 2011, 2:27 am
SK v WL, despite being decided on the 26th February 2010, has just been reported on Bailii. [read post]
4 Feb 2015, 10:28 am
Additional Resources: Budzko v. [read post]
28 Jul 2018, 9:27 am
Bullcoming v. [read post]
19 Mar 2022, 11:54 am
Case citation: Zuckerbrot v. [read post]
16 Apr 2022, 9:43 am
Sellers v. [read post]
17 Nov 2017, 10:43 am
Floyd v. [read post]
11 May 2007, 9:35 am
Betty Kunz v. [read post]
14 Aug 2014, 12:49 pm
Early in its new Term, when the Court examines the case of Mehanna v. [read post]
