Search for: "Holder v. United States"
Results 3361 - 3380
of 4,275
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jun 2018, 8:52 am
However, in 2012, the Court decided in United States v. [read post]
7 Oct 2009, 11:16 am
Based in Oakbrook Terrace and Chicago, we represent clients of all sizes throughout the states of Illinois, Indiana and Wisconsin, and throughout the United States. [read post]
26 Apr 2009, 11:36 am
To mitigate the effect of that violation, Canada must present a request to the United States for Mr. [read post]
5 Dec 2007, 4:52 pm
State of California (1998) 63 Cal.App.4th 1108; see People v. [read post]
5 Nov 2021, 5:01 am
We explain these procedures below but first offer a brief explanation of how the war powers provisions of the NSRAA would regulate the United States’ engagement in hostilities abroad. [read post]
15 Mar 2016, 5:09 pm
The United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Engelmayer, J.) dismissed the complaint, holding, inter alia, that plaintiffs had failed to allege subjective and objective falsity as to defendants’ projections and statements of opinion. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 5:49 pm
v=1226 http://a.img-dpreview.com/Articles/Files/1999431312/image7.jpg? [read post]
25 May 2022, 2:15 am
Australia’s corporate regulators are united in stating that cybersecurity is a priority focus, as has the Federal Government with recent amendments to critical infrastructure legislation and the broader cybersecurity consultation. [read post]
19 Jan 2017, 12:03 pm
Basic facts In D’Agostino v. [read post]
19 Jan 2017, 12:03 pm
Basic facts In D’Agostino v. [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 12:03 pm
The Trademark Trial and Appeal Board of the United States Patent and Trademark Office reached a decision on March 25th . . . [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 4:21 am
(PatLit) United Kingdom Limitation of damages in the Patents County Court (EPLAW) UKIPO issues TPN (3/2011) – hearings in cases of invalidation on relative grounds (Class 46) United States US General Does 337 apply to foreign trade secret missapropiation? [read post]
25 Oct 2007, 7:53 pm
Hearn, United States: SEC Approves Two Alternative Proposals Relating To Share holder Access (Sept. 17, 2007), [www.mondaq.com]. 11 Lucian Arye Bebchuk, The Case for Shareholder Access To The Ballot, 59 Bus. [read post]
28 May 2009, 8:58 am
United States, 546 F.3d 450 (2008), acknowledged that their holdings were at odds with the decisions of seven other circuits, including the Second in Campusano. [read post]
18 May 2010, 1:10 am
Dustcontrol International (EPLAW) United Kingdom EWHC (Pat): Infringement action won't be stayed pending foreign decision in non-patent claim: Elmotech Ltd & Anor v Guidance Ltd & Anor (PatLit) United States US General Director Kappos testimony to Congress (Patently-O) Judge Michel: USPTO should receive $1 billion infusion of cash (Patently-O) (Inventive Step) The US Reporting on IPRs - the Watch List (IP tango) Industrial design in… [read post]
25 Aug 2010, 8:46 am
August 23, 2010 Following the trend of a majority of the Circuit Courts, the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of New Jersey concludes that a Chapter 7 debtor may not void a lien under §506(d) where the claim is wholly unsecured. [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 10:02 am
CORIOLAN, Appellant, v. [read post]
8 May 2012, 12:54 pm
Holder. [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 4:36 pm
United States (Copyright Litigation Blog) (Property, intangible) US Trade Marks – Decisions Precedential No. 7: TTAB deems internet printouts admissible via notice of reliance: Safer, Inc v OMS Investments, Inc (TTABlog) TTAB vacates 2008 fraud ruling in Herbaceuticals, Inc v Xel Pharmaceuticals, Inc (TTABlog) TTAB affirms 2(d) refusal of CARMINE’S design for restaurant services in view of two other CARMINE’S designs: In re Carmine's… [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 4:36 pm
United States (Copyright Litigation Blog) (Property, intangible) US Trade Marks – Decisions Precedential No. 7: TTAB deems internet printouts admissible via notice of reliance: Safer, Inc v OMS Investments, Inc (TTABlog) TTAB vacates 2008 fraud ruling in Herbaceuticals, Inc v Xel Pharmaceuticals, Inc (TTABlog) TTAB affirms 2(d) refusal of CARMINE’S design for restaurant services in view of two other CARMINE’S designs: In re Carmine's… [read post]
