Search for: "Peoples v. Peoples"
Results 3361 - 3380
of 72,905
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Aug 2023, 5:01 am
Arnold, not People v. [read post]
23 Aug 2023, 5:00 am
., advised the Town of Mount Pleasant that it was intending to build a residential facility for six developmentally disabled adults, the Town objected and requested a hearing pursuant to the state’s Mental Hygiene Law.After the Acting Commissioner of the New York State Office for People with Developmental Disabilities rejected the Town’s objections and approved the project, a special proceeding [pursuant to CPLR Article] was filed with the New York State Supreme Court and… [read post]
23 Aug 2023, 4:47 am
In McCollum v. [read post]
23 Aug 2023, 4:00 am
By Eric SegallI had an existential crisis in the Spring of 2012, just a few months before the hugely important Affordable Care Act case, NFIB v. [read post]
23 Aug 2023, 3:07 am
Circuit’s recent Frederick Douglass Foundation v. [read post]
23 Aug 2023, 2:09 am
Here, vaccine attorney Leah V. [read post]
22 Aug 2023, 9:00 pm
Here, vaccine attorney Leah V. [read post]
22 Aug 2023, 7:09 pm
Ltd v. 99 Trade Co. [read post]
22 Aug 2023, 3:37 pm
From McCollum v. [read post]
22 Aug 2023, 2:33 pm
See Doe v. [read post]
22 Aug 2023, 11:12 am
Stein, 347 U.S. 201 (1954) and Goldstein v. [read post]
22 Aug 2023, 10:40 am
See also Doe 1 v. [read post]
22 Aug 2023, 10:20 am
From yesterday's decision in Cajune v. [read post]
22 Aug 2023, 10:13 am
This is especially true if other people were around at the time the drugs were found. [read post]
22 Aug 2023, 9:15 am
This West Chester lawmaker invited her testimony, chair says,” Ohio Capital Journal (July 14, 2021). [2] The Disinformation Dozen (2021), [3] Shaw v. [read post]
22 Aug 2023, 6:32 am
From Friday's decision in Amor v. [read post]
22 Aug 2023, 6:06 am
” Accordingly, some people may want to vote for a 28-year-old candidate as in 1968 when activists at the Democratic National Convention tried to nominate underage Julian Bond for vice president. [read post]
22 Aug 2023, 5:42 am
When examining whether mass surveillance measures are necessary and proportionate under Article 8 ECHR, the European Court of Human Rights has focused its review on whether appropriate safeguards against government abuse exist.While the Court has not recently carried out a balancing exercise between the benefits sought by mass surveillance and its impact on society, the Grand Chamber judgment from S. and Marper v. the U.K., a case in which the Court found unanimously that the collection and… [read post]
22 Aug 2023, 5:01 am
Technologists v. [read post]
22 Aug 2023, 2:05 am
Montague v. [read post]
