Search for: "State v. Character"
Results 3361 - 3380
of 7,506
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Oct 2015, 3:30 am
Ltd. v. [read post]
17 Oct 2015, 11:28 am
It’s only the Tom Cruise avatar playing another character that seems to drive courts crazy. [read post]
16 Oct 2015, 11:24 pm
(@jilliancyork) October 3, 2015 In less than 140 characters, Jillian C. [read post]
16 Oct 2015, 10:41 am
Compare Cheema v. [read post]
16 Oct 2015, 6:13 am
Touchpoint Communications, LLC v. [read post]
14 Oct 2015, 2:51 am
This distinction is well known under EU trade mark law: for example, the criteria for establishing distinctive character of an applied-for sign are the same in all cases, but they are applied differently to, eg, word marks, shape marks and non-traditional marks].* The registration of earlier trade marks as collective marks cannot, per se, give rise to a presumption that those marks have average distinctive character [read post]
11 Oct 2015, 2:37 pm
In Case C-228/03 Gillette Co v LA-Laboratories Ltd Oy, the CJEU stated that use that does not create an impression of commercial connection or take unfair advantage of the earlier mark’s distinctive character or repute will be considered honest practice. [read post]
11 Oct 2015, 3:43 am
Roederer v J Garcia Carrion S.A. [read post]
10 Oct 2015, 3:48 am
The European Court of Justice ruled against the Safe Harbor framework in Schrems v. [read post]
10 Oct 2015, 1:01 am
” [This became painfully evident in the 1896 Supreme Court case Plessy v. [read post]
6 Oct 2015, 4:59 am
First, the character must generally have physical as well as conceptual qualities [meaning it has to not simply be a literary idea, but manifest itself in a physical and/or conceptual manner, such as in images, movies etc.]; second, the character must be sufficiently delineated to be recognizable as the same character whenever it appears [this need not be in terms of appearance, but through their character, personality etc.]; and third, the… [read post]
5 Oct 2015, 6:30 pm
See Baskin v. [read post]
5 Oct 2015, 9:09 am
In a class that is coming up soon, we will be discussing the U.S. transfer pricing rules.From a purely pedagogical perspective, when I read the recent case of Altera Corp. v. [read post]
5 Oct 2015, 5:54 am
") AC36250 - State v. [read post]
4 Oct 2015, 5:02 pm
Supreme Court’s June 2010 decision in Morrison v. [read post]
1 Oct 2015, 1:19 pm
” Mergenthaler v. [read post]
1 Oct 2015, 6:00 am
”[v] Justice Anthony M. [read post]
29 Sep 2015, 8:36 am
As it turns out, he is called to a different kind of service – as a clerk at the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
29 Sep 2015, 5:57 am
” Ultimately, the IFA could not establish that Seattle franchisees are “out-of-state entities,” or that the corresponding franchises “are so interstate in character relative to non-franchises that a distinction drawn on this basis interferes with interstate commerce. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 3:32 pm
(People v. [read post]
