Search for: "State v. Price" Results 3361 - 3380 of 13,237
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Aug 2018, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
"Thus, said the court, SDHR did not err by adopting the total offset method to determine the value of Seabury's lost pension benefits and confirmed its determination. * See Executive Law §298.** Matter of Rensselaer County Sheriff's Dept. v New York State Div. of Human Rights, 131 AD3d 777.The decision is posted on the Internet at:http://www.nycourts.gov/reporter/3dseries/2018/2018_05719.htm [read post]
6 Nov 2008, 4:49 pm
Cir. 2005), no indication that participants monitored prices in other markets, see Dee-K Enters., Inc. v. [read post]
24 Sep 2014, 6:08 am
Kristin Ford (Pincelli) August 1 at 3:15 PM:`Eric-Just saw that the prices were creeping up a little. [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 7:49 am
Summary of presentation: On Tuesday, April 19, 2011, the United States Supreme Court heard arguments in American Electric Power, et al v Connecticut, et al (10-174) ("AEP"), a case filed by eight states, one city and three land trusts seeking an order requiring five of the nation's largest coal-fired power producers to reduce their emissions for at least a decade. [read post]