Search for: "State v. White"
Results 3361 - 3380
of 13,742
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Feb 2021, 2:26 pm
And the closing words of Article V read that “no State, without its Consent, shall be deprived of its equal Suffrage in the Senate. [read post]
16 Sep 2017, 1:08 pm
In U.S. v. [read post]
5 Nov 2013, 8:55 am
Today the Supreme Court hears oral arguments in Bond v. [read post]
17 Apr 2009, 1:45 pm
The full text is, "All persons within the jurisdiction of the United States shall have the same right in every State and Territory to make and enforce contracts, to sue, be parties, give evidence, and to the full and equal benefit of all laws and proceedings for the security of persons and property as is enjoyed by white citizens, and shall be subject to like punishment, pains, penalties, taxes, licenses, and exactions of every kind, and to no other. [read post]
16 Sep 2020, 4:43 am
Bollinger and Grutter v. [read post]
27 Jan 2017, 7:25 am
United States v. [read post]
1 Feb 2017, 10:04 am
Luca Marzorati previewed the argument in John Doe v. [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 7:50 am
Cuomo v. [read post]
8 Mar 2017, 3:59 am
On Monday, the court issued an opinion in Beckles v. [read post]
27 Oct 2007, 7:10 pm
Johnson, 440 F.3d 262 (5th Cir. 2006); White v. [read post]
17 Jul 2009, 5:00 pm
What really happened in the Ricci v. [read post]
28 Sep 2021, 8:35 am
Hazel, Michael V. [read post]
1 May 2023, 7:47 am
In the latest loss in United States v. [read post]
8 May 2021, 2:55 pm
United States, about reductions of prison sentences for certain crack cocaine offenses. [read post]
26 Nov 2019, 12:50 pm
United States, 136 S. [read post]
16 May 2016, 11:12 am
Only one summary disposition involves criminal law.Kernan v. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 11:13 am
White v. [read post]
12 Nov 2008, 10:15 am
It took me awhile to track down the transcript of oral arguments from Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 9:14 am
Farmers Insurance line of cases – Bell v. [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 8:18 pm
He then argues that principles of federalism would also have discouraged such a result, since they required the court to defer to the stated legislative purpose of the state that had passed the law. [read post]
