Search for: "A. A. READ, Appeals Examiner"
Results 321 - 340
of 11,596
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
TTAB Vacates Prince of Wales Section 2(b) Decision and Remands Application to the Examining Attorney
21 Mar 2018, 4:06 am
" Read comments and post your comment here.TTABlog comment: Interesting way to get a second bit of the apple. [read post]
4 Nov 2022, 1:36 am
The appeal is against the decision of the examining division to refuse the present application based on a sole claim request. [read post]
4 Sep 2011, 12:05 pm
In examining this case, the court reviewed the policy which read: Agreement We will provide the insurance described in this policy in return for the premium and compliance with all applicable provisions of this policy. [read post]
22 Mar 2024, 4:20 am
That case is now before the Appeal Review Panel at the USPTO following remand from the Federal Circuit. [read post]
13 Mar 2020, 7:58 am
From The PTO: Until further notice, examiner and examining attorney interviews, Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) and Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB) oral hearings, and other similar in-person meetings with parties and stakeholders scheduled to take place at USPTO offices on or after Friday, March 13, 2020 will be conducted remotely by video or telephone. [read post]
27 May 2016, 11:30 am
Arunachalammay appeal the examiner’s decision to the Board. [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 5:40 pm
The court reasoned as follows: [W]e have no occasion to examine the factual sufficiency of [the translation/advocacy] activities as a basis for his terrorism-related convictions. [read post]
1 Aug 2021, 1:30 am
Ex parte Horne, APPEAL 2020-004000, 2021 WL 2788193 (2021) Applicant claimed a saw blade blank without cutting teeth and the examiner rejected the claims as lacking utility since it was just a work-in-process. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 5:39 am
The court of appeals examined this issue in In re D.K.L., 201 N.C.App. 443 (2009). [read post]
19 Jul 2021, 12:08 pm
by Dennis Crouch If affirmances by the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) are any guide, patent examiners appear to now have a good handle on applying the PTAB eligibility examination guidance. [read post]
2 Oct 2007, 11:46 am
First off, the 80% assumption jacks up the historical 70-75 % examining time existing in the patent corp, where the remaining time is used for training, appeals conferences, interviews, leave time, etc. [read post]
18 Jan 2024, 7:48 am
Both tests resulted in 0.11 BAC readings. [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 12:22 pm
We invite you to read the full notice and submit your comments to BPAI.Rules@uspto.gov. [read post]
17 Dec 2019, 7:58 am
In a decision issued today (December 17, 2019), the North Carolina Court of Appeals examined the authority of an association to review and deny submitted architectural plans. [read post]
1 Aug 2014, 12:09 pm
Colvin, an appeal filed in the U.S. [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 7:04 am
In a decision issued today (March 19, 2019), the North Carolina Court of Appeals examined the issue of proper architectural committees and their decisions. [read post]
17 Dec 2019, 7:58 am
In a decision issued today (December 17, 2019), the North Carolina Court of Appeals examined the authority of an association to review and deny submitted architectural plans. [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 7:04 am
In a decision issued today (March 19, 2019), the North Carolina Court of Appeals examined the issue of proper architectural committees and their decisions. [read post]
9 Aug 2016, 1:00 am
Mark EngstromCCHThe Patent Trial and Appeal Board did not err in affirming a patent examiner’s rejection of three claims of an IPCom patent on a system for allowing access rights to cell phone channels, the U.S. [read post]
24 Jul 2017, 2:07 pm
The term “material supervisory determinations” is defined by the Reigle Act to include determinations relating to (1) examination ratings; (2) the adequacy of loan loss reserve provisions; and (3) classifications of loans that are significant to an institution. [read post]
