Search for: "Appeal of Rice"
Results 321 - 340
of 1,050
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jan 2019, 2:48 pm
Court of Appeals for the 7th Circuit enjoined those laws by a 2-1 vote. [read post]
3 Jan 2019, 4:25 am
GREATER OMAHA DecisionCAFC Renders Split Decision in CORN THINS and RICE THINS Appeal: Affirming Mere Descriptiveness But Remanding on GenericnessOther: TTAB Schedules Eleven (11) Oral Hearings for January 2019TTAB Posts December 2018 Hearing ScheduleTTAB Posts November 2018 Hearing ScheduleDoes a Law School Professor Have Standing to Oppose RAPUNZEL for Dolls and Toy Figures? [read post]
18 Dec 2018, 1:37 pm
However, the state’s Court of Appeals upheld the law in 2013, Insurance Journal reported. [read post]
15 Dec 2018, 12:34 pm
Jeffery Redding, No. 115,037 (Rice)Sentencing appealMichael P. [read post]
14 Dec 2018, 2:41 pm
The US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (the “CAFC”) affirmed the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board’s (the “Board”) decision refusing to register the marks CORN THINS and RICE THINS for snack foods, and vacated the Board’s decision dismissing a claim that these same marks were generic. [read post]
9 Dec 2018, 7:10 am
" Cleveland police union determined to return officer who killed Tamir Rice back to the force. [read post]
5 Dec 2018, 5:58 pm
The appeal proposal is radical as:current appeals are dealt with by specialist appeal judges from the Family Court. [read post]
6 Nov 2018, 11:25 am
Matthew also explains, then casts doubt on, a Florida Appeals Court decision that rejects the “foregone conclusion” doctrine for compelled passcode disclosure. [read post]
6 Nov 2018, 11:25 am
Matthew also explains, then casts doubt on, a Florida Appeals Court decision that rejects the “foregone conclusion” doctrine for compelled passcode disclosure. [read post]
5 Nov 2018, 2:39 pm
Matthew also explains, then casts doubt on, a Florida Appeals Court decision that rejects the "foregone conclusion" doctrine for compelled passcode disclosure. [read post]
29 Oct 2018, 12:07 pm
She was an associate at Howard, Rice, Nemerovski, Canady, Robertson and Falk from 1986 to 1990 and a research attorney at the San Francisco County Superior Court from 1985 to 1986. [read post]
26 Oct 2018, 1:28 pm
She was an associate at Howard, Rice, Nemerovski, Canady, Robertson and Falk from 1986 to 1990 and a research attorney at the San Francisco County Superior Court from 1985 to 1986. [read post]
16 Oct 2018, 6:08 am
., the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board properly determined that the marks CORN THINS and RICE THINS were highly descriptive of their respective goods—”crispbread slices predominantly of corn, namely popped corn cakes” and “crispbread slices primarily made of rice, namely rice cakes”—and that Real Foods failed to prove that the marks had acquired distinctiveness among consumers, the U.S. [read post]
14 Oct 2018, 8:09 am
The veteran was employed as a Sergeant with the Rice County Sheriff's Department. [read post]
11 Oct 2018, 3:10 am
The CAFC issued a spit decision in this appeal from the TTAB's February 21, 2017 ruling [TTABlogged here] sustaining oppositions to registration of CORN THINS for "crispbread slices predominantly of corn, namely popped corn cakes," and RICE THINS for "crispbread slices primarily made of rice, namely rice cakes" [CORN and RICE disclaimed]. [read post]
8 Oct 2018, 11:55 am
At the Law Offices of Randolph Rice, we are acutely aware of the dangers of posed to pregnant women in auto accidents. [read post]
6 Oct 2018, 7:17 am
(“Real Foods”) [represented by Norris, McLaughlin & Marcus]sought registration of two marks: “CORN THINS,” for “crispbreadslices predominantly of corn, namely popped corncakes”; and “RICE THINS,” for “crispbread slices primarilymade of rice, namely rice cakes. [read post]
4 Oct 2018, 2:30 pm
Real Foods sells food products that look a lot like rice cakes, but calls them CORN THINS and RICE THINS. [read post]
3 Oct 2018, 12:50 pm
This case fell under Topic 7, with the term stems: appeal, issu, provid, determin, clear and offici. [read post]
2 Oct 2018, 1:00 pm
One court upheld a movie studio in a lawsuit by the Edgar Rice Burroughs family, which claimed that films about the jungle “ape man” Tarzan, had infringed on the copyright of the original books. [read post]
