Search for: "Application of Floyd"
Results 321 - 340
of 607
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Mar 2017, 9:15 am
Just the other week, I wrote about how UFC superstar Conor McGregor had filed an application to register his name as a trademark, and in that same article, I mentioned that undefeated Floyd “Money” Mayweather also has his name registered with the USPTO. [read post]
3 Feb 2017, 9:27 am
Overhauser Law Offices the publisher of this site, assists with US and foreign trademark searches, trademark applications and assists with enforcing trademarks via infringement litigation and licensing. [read post]
3 Feb 2017, 9:27 am
Overhauser Law Offices the publisher of this site, assists with US and foreign trademark searches, trademark applications and assists with enforcing trademarks via infringement litigation and licensing. [read post]
25 Jan 2017, 10:48 pm
De minimis and Quia Timet injunctions Napp v Dr Reddy’s [2016] EWHC 1517 (Pat) provides a useful summary of the law relating to the application of the de minimis principle and of the interplay between de minimis and quia timet injunctions. [read post]
13 Jan 2017, 9:24 am
The appeals from these strike out applications were therefore dismissed. [read post]
21 Dec 2016, 12:48 am
Lord Justice Floyd observed that the Court of Appeal is now in a good position to obtain the assistance of the parties. [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 11:58 pm
Arnold J refused the application to amend and considered it an abuse of process. [read post]
21 Nov 2016, 12:00 am
The case was previously reported on the IPKat here (first instance) and here (interim application). [read post]
18 Nov 2016, 12:44 am
John Collins, Sumer Dayal and Natalie ShoolmanClayton Utz by John Collins, Natalie Shoolman & Sumer Dayal On 21 October 2016, the Federal Court of Australia handed down its judgment in the case of Apotex Pty Ltd v Warner-Lambert Company LLC (No 2) [2016] FCA 1238 (FCA Judgment). [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 3:36 pm
Gilead denied infringement and counterclaimed for revocation on the grounds of lack of novelty over Gilead's own International Patent Application, lack of inventive step, insufficiency and added matter. [read post]
13 Oct 2016, 6:50 am
Following a long line of authority including Nikken v Pioneer [2005] and Nokia v IPCom [2011], Floyd LJ held that it was necessary to distinguish between pre-trial applications to amend and post-trial deletions on the one hand, and post-trial validating amendments by re-writing the claims on the other. [read post]
22 Sep 2016, 7:10 am
"While Jacob LJ in Saint Gobain PAM SA v Fusion-Provida Ltd [2005] EWCA Civ 177 (Katpost) articulated a test that appeared to be rather general – it must be "more-or-less self-evident that what is being tested ought to work", Floyd LJ has now clarified that this “is far from being a test of universal application”, quoting with approval the warning of Kitchin LJ in Novartis AG v Generics (UK) Ltd [2012] EWCA Civ 1623 (Katpost) against… [read post]
9 Sep 2016, 6:45 am
Accreditation: 14.5 learning hours The application deadline is 9th December 2016, or earlier if fully booked before that date. [read post]
31 Aug 2016, 3:04 pm
Anyone who works with livestock knows how difficult it can be to manage manure properly from an economic, environmental and animal health standpoint (not necessarily in that order). 28,000 hogs (and their manure) were affected during Hurricane Floyd. [read post]
29 Jul 2016, 7:37 am
All eleven applications had been rejected by the UK IPO on the basis of lack of industrial applicability and sufficiency (plausibility). [read post]
19 Jul 2016, 4:33 am
Wording in the policy emphasizes that there is no guarantee an applicant will have their preferences met. [read post]
24 Jun 2016, 10:18 am
Mississippi, 14-10486, and Floyd v. [read post]
17 Jun 2016, 12:00 pm
Now we have yet another group of capital cases from the Gulf Coast that look like potential GVR candidates that instead keep getting relisted: Floyd v. [read post]
10 Jun 2016, 9:32 am
The Tenth Circuit affirmed, holding that judicial estoppel was a doctrine applicable only to facts, not law. [read post]
9 Jun 2016, 4:00 am
Accordingly, the Appellate Division awarded the City damages in the amount of $316,535.54 and declared that the City was relieved of its obligation to provide Whalen health insurance benefits earned through his employment.* See William Floyd Union Free School Dist. v Wright, 61 AD3d 856.The decision is posted on the Internet at:http://www.nycourts.gov/reporter/3dseries/2016/2016_04289.htm [read post]
