Search for: "Asbestos Products Liability v."
Results 321 - 340
of 552
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 May 2018, 9:51 am
Devries, in which the justices will consider the scope of liability for products that cause injuries. [read post]
26 Feb 2012, 10:31 am
Meta-analytic studies have also figured prominently in non-pharmaceutical product liability litigation, as well as in litigation over videogames, criminal recidivism, and eyewitness testimony. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 12:17 pm
Today, in O’Neill v. [read post]
10 May 2011, 7:51 am
” [Kevin Couch, Abnormal Use] Tags: product liability, South Carolina Related posts Update: Branham v. [read post]
9 Sep 2014, 11:33 am
BASF Catalysts LLC, et al., asbestos victims provided evidence to the court that "that BASF and ['the New York law firm that defended it for years in asbestos cases, Cahill Gordon & Reindel LLP'] systematically collected and destroyed or hid evidence of asbestos-contaminated products produced by a BASF predecessor, Engelhard, in order to evade liability and forge quick settlements. [read post]
6 May 2011, 9:01 am
Co. v. [read post]
29 Jul 2009, 2:32 pm
[Kinsman v. [read post]
5 May 2009, 5:00 am
But the fundamental tension about how to treat absent PRPs arises in prescription drug product liability actions, too. [read post]
4 May 2012, 9:30 am
Chandler v. [read post]
7 May 2015, 7:06 pm
Blommer v. [read post]
8 May 2009, 5:01 am
This announcement, and the inevitable speculation about the identity and judicial philosophy of his replacement, makes one wonder about the impact of the impending change on those of us in the mass tort and products liability field. [read post]
4 Oct 2013, 12:00 am
” In 1910, a GM engineer testifying in MacPherson v. [read post]
15 Jan 2010, 7:45 am
Dent v. [read post]
22 Jan 2009, 2:06 am
Contrary to bedrock product liability principles going all the way back to seminal decision in Greenman v. [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 4:01 pm
That products liability case presents the question whether the defendants, who manufactured valves and pumps that the Navy installed on its ships in the 1940’s, can be strictly liable for injuries that allegedly occurred when a Navy seaman was exposed in the 1960’s to asbestos fibers released from insulation and sealants that the Navy used in conjunction with the defendants’ valves and pumps. [read post]
14 May 2021, 9:48 am
Environmental litigators, like products liability litigators, must heed the lessons of Lanzo. [read post]
14 May 2021, 9:48 am
Environmental litigators, like products liability litigators, must heed the lessons of Lanzo. [read post]
14 May 2021, 9:48 am
Environmental litigators, like products liability litigators, must heed the lessons of Lanzo. [read post]
7 Jun 2020, 1:17 am
The relevant Utah statute was interpreted in an asbestos products case, in which the defendants asserted that: “the physician who rendered the diagnoses and the technician who administered the pulmonary function tests did so without the required licenses. [read post]
5 May 2015, 8:00 am
Court Rejects Scientific Theory in Asbestos Litigation; Betz/Simikian v. [read post]
