Search for: "Billings v. Johnson" Results 321 - 340 of 1,231
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Jun 2019, 11:00 am
Johnson, Collins, and Stivers, have released the draft bill, which removes this prohibition and erases all related prior court precedent. [read post]
14 May 2019, 7:29 am by Andrew Hamm
Considering the stakes involved, I wanted to start with some fireworks and this scene definitely fit the bill. [read post]
7 May 2019, 2:27 pm by Ad Law Defense
  That was one of the questions posed to a Utah jury in Bimbo Bakeries USA, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Apr 2019, 4:30 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
This claim is not duplicative of the legal malpractice claim, as plaintiff’s complaints regarding the over billing were not a direct challenge to the quality of the work but instead a claim that the fee paid bore no rational relationship to the work performed (see Ullmann-Schneider v Lacher & Lovell-Taylor, P.C., 121 AD3d 415, 416 [1st Dept 2014]; Johnson, 129 AD3d at 70). [read post]
12 Apr 2019, 2:35 pm by opseo
That’s not a lot of money, so seniors need to be prepared for the tax bill which can really affect their bottom-like. [read post]
1 Apr 2019, 9:14 am by Rick Pildes
  The Court-packing bill was the first piece of legislation FDR put forward after this massive 1936 electoral triumph. [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 10:00 am by Site Admin
Where I’m located, there are a lot of people who work for Johnson & Johnson, and Johnson & Johnson is basically known for equaling. [read post]
25 Feb 2019, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman and Grant Hayden
Employers may, for example, treat one group more favorably than another pursuant to a bona fide affirmative action plan in order to remedy past discrimination (Johnson v. [read post]
15 Feb 2019, 1:58 am by Dave
In R(B) v Redbridge LBC [2019] EWHC 250 (Admin), Jeremy Johnson QC, sitting as a Deputy Judge, was required to adjudicate on what is, as far as I am concerned, a really important point of practice, given the nature and continuing obligations of suitability of accommodation in homelessness cases, and the increasing number of suitability reviews (especially following the 2017 Act). [read post]
13 Feb 2019, 10:37 am by scanner1
Billings Clinic DA 18-0265 2019 MT 42 Civil – Judicial Review Kapor v. [read post]
10 Feb 2019, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
It was reported that the claimants faced a £3m legal bill. [read post]