Search for: "Blake v. State"
Results 321 - 340
of 976
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Oct 2016, 7:38 am
He contended that the State’s failure to provide the requisite notice ran afoul of Blakely v. [read post]
26 Oct 2016, 7:38 am
He contended that the State’s failure to provide the requisite notice ran afoul of Blakely v. [read post]
21 Oct 2016, 4:49 am
” Briefly: At the National Conference of State Legislatures Blog, Lisa Soronen previews Endrew F. v. [read post]
29 Sep 2016, 8:44 am
(Mike Blake/Reuters) The Supreme Court just agreed to hear Expressions Hair Design v. [read post]
9 Sep 2016, 7:20 am
Washington, 2004), sentencing facts for the jury (Blakely v. [read post]
5 Sep 2016, 7:43 am
Subsequently, Blakely v. [read post]
5 Sep 2016, 4:28 am
Article Four further stated as follows:As an extremely loving and devoted parent, I found that the love, care and concern which I lavished on my daughter was not acknowledged or returned in any way by my daughter. [read post]
22 Aug 2016, 6:00 am
Department of State; Assistant Secretary of State, Educational and Cultural Affairs. [read post]
21 Aug 2016, 8:09 am
He left us a few years back and went first to the General Jurisdiction and then to the Family Division where he serves today.He will tell you that his favorite case ever sitting as a Judge was the case of State of Florida v. [read post]
19 Aug 2016, 2:24 pm
Credit Union v. [read post]
18 Aug 2016, 8:37 am
Blake, decided June 6, 2016 (107 lower court citations)... 3) Mullenix v. [read post]
30 Jul 2016, 8:08 am
I agree, though it should be mentioned that some of this could also be addressed much sooner by Congress or via state legislatures. [read post]
26 Jul 2016, 7:05 am
Blake, 136 S. [read post]
24 Jun 2016, 9:05 am
” Molly also rounded up early coverage and commentary on yesterday’s four-four tie in United States v. [read post]
20 Jun 2016, 6:19 pm
Filburn, Lopez, and United States v. [read post]
13 Jun 2016, 4:00 am
Exhausting administrative remediesRoss v Blake, USSC, Docket No. 15-339This decision by the United States Supreme Court considered an appeal involving the federal Prison Litigation Reform Act [PLRA], 42 USC 1997e(a) requirement that an inmate exhaust “such administrative remedies as are available” before bringing suit. [read post]
9 Jun 2016, 4:34 am
” At Townhall, Jonathan Wood weighs in on last week’s ruling in United States Army Corps of Engineers v. [read post]
7 Jun 2016, 9:01 pm
Case v. [read post]
7 Jun 2016, 8:33 am
Justice Kagan with opinion in Ross v. [read post]
7 Jun 2016, 6:58 am
Blake comes from Barbara Leonard of Courthouse News Service. [read post]
