Search for: "Board of Corrections" Results 321 - 340 of 13,178
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jan 2024, 7:39 am by Rose Hughes
Recent Boards of Appeal decisions have not even considered the description relevant to the definition of clear claim language (IPKat). [read post]
It is now up to the US Supreme Court to determine whether the plaintiffs were correct in bringing their § 1983 claim before exhausting all state administrative remedies, or if the state court is correct in their reading of Patsy. [read post]
13 Jan 2024, 11:17 am by Eric Goldman
(C) The social media platform provided to each member of the social media platform’s board of directors a true and correct copy of each audit within 90 days of the audit being completed accompanied by a description of any action taken pursuant to subparagraph (B). (4) Without in any way limiting the application of the term “knowingly” under paragraph (1), for purposes of this subdivision, a social media platform shall be deemed to have knowledge under… [read post]
It is also required to file an annual report periodically to the board for a 5-year period following the implementation of the corrective measures. [read post]
10 Jan 2024, 8:05 pm by John Elwood
Missouri Department of Corrections v. [read post]
10 Jan 2024, 6:43 am by Dan Bressler
Database Management: Correct inconsistent party information on requests as submitted. [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 2:47 pm by Steve Bainbridge
” If the WSJ report is correct, it would seem that neither prong of the Caremark theory would be satisfied on these facts. [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 2:10 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
Under the Resolution Agreement reached with Optum, Optum agreed to pay $160,000 to OCR as well as implement a corrective action plan that requires workforce training, reporting records requests to OCR, and reviewing and revising as necessary its right of access policies and procedures to provide timely responses to requests. [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 10:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
     Woodbourne Fire District – Board Oversight (Sullivan County) The board did not provide adequate oversight of the district’s financial operations. [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 10:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
     Woodbourne Fire District – Board Oversight (Sullivan County) The board did not provide adequate oversight of the district’s financial operations. [read post]
7 Jan 2024, 9:34 am by Rose Hughes
 Admittedly, however, there is currently disagreement among the Boards of Appeal as to the correct approach to claim interpretation. [read post]
7 Jan 2024, 2:01 am by Eleonora Rosati
According to the EUIPO Second Board of Appeal (BoA) in its decision on 19 December last (R 827/2023-2) the answer is mostly not, at least if the argument is that such a pattern would be inherently distinctive. [read post]
6 Jan 2024, 1:24 am by Kluwer Patent blogger
Back to the EPO for number 5: EPO makes correct diagnosis but prescribes the wrong medication with the Proposed Amendments to the Rules of Procedure of the Boards of Appeal. [read post]
5 Jan 2024, 1:15 pm by Eileen McDermott
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit decision invalidating alternative sweetener patent claims and a precedential designation from the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board. [read post]
5 Jan 2024, 1:15 pm by Eileen McDermott
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit decision invalidating alternative sweetener patent claims and a precedential designation from the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board. [read post]
Along with Koroma, there were 12 other former officials, including Koroma’s bodyguard, ex-police and correctional officers, charged on Tuesday for their alleged roles in the failed coup. [read post]
5 Jan 2024, 3:33 am
The Board construed the response to the summary judgment motion as a “cross-motion to amend the registrations due to a correctable owner’s mistake. [read post]
4 Jan 2024, 12:44 pm by John Elwood
Fairfax County School Board, implicates that concern. [read post]
3 Jan 2024, 5:08 am
The Board has made available a form for nominating a Board decision as precedential. [read post]
That is, in the specific scenario, the applicant’s mistake cannot be corrected on appeal, given that the preclusion of the matter prevents the appellate board from hearing the appeal. [read post]