Search for: "Bond v. State"
Results 321 - 340
of 4,387
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Nov 2013, 2:34 pm
United States, Buckley v. [read post]
29 Sep 2010, 8:42 am
Janine Cox won in State v. [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 8:27 am
Rodrigues [SCOTUSblog Materials], in which the court must determine three issues concerning whether aliens seeking entry into the United States must be afforded bond hearings, especially in situations involving criminal or terrorist aliens who are subject to mandatory detention. [read post]
16 Sep 2011, 3:00 am
In the case of the day from June 6, 2011, Scheck v. [read post]
21 May 2007, 10:26 am
In addition, Stohr reports here on the Court's decision to review states' power to tax the interest on other states' municipal bonds for Bloomberg; Peter Lattman weighs in here on the Kentucky municipal bond case at the WSJ.com Law Blog; Caron has this post on today's grant in Davis at the TaxProf Blog; and the AP has this report. [read post]
3 May 2012, 8:38 am
As a result, and as was the case in Elliott v. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 5:15 am
Bonds v. [read post]
3 Nov 2014, 12:16 pm
Miami Beach v. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 2:24 pm
See, e.g., NFIB v. [read post]
25 Apr 2020, 7:37 am
The Delaware Chancery Court recently ruled that municipal bond powerhouse Nuveen LLC improperly used “lies” and “threats” in a successful campaign to damage the business of much smaller rival Preston Hollow Capital LLC but it declined to enjoin the alleged wrongs because Nuveen had discontinued them in Preston Hollow Capital LLC v. [read post]
11 May 2020, 4:10 am
The complaint (full text) in Spell v. [read post]
28 Feb 2018, 6:01 am
See Jennings v. [read post]
10 Oct 2012, 12:35 pm
United States; No. 10-41311; Keller v. [read post]
14 May 2019, 2:22 pm
So the bondsman is liable on the bond, and is ordered to pay the $100,000 bond. [read post]
20 Jun 2014, 10:56 am
The principle is a first-cousin of the presumption against preemption (which has been around at least since the 1930s) and was itself announced in Gregory v. [read post]
10 Apr 2020, 7:18 pm
Earlier today, United States District Judge James V. [read post]
10 Apr 2020, 7:18 pm
Earlier today, United States District Judge James V. [read post]
27 Apr 2015, 2:13 pm
In a recent decision issued by the United States Court of Federal Claims, Anthem Builders, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 4:27 am
It was one such case which was recently considered by the English High Court in Wuhan Guoyu v Emporiki Bank of Greece [2012] EWHC 1715 (Comm). [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 6:04 pm
§ 3582(c)), and even though the right to counsel applies to post-sentencing actions that affect time in custody (Mempa v. [read post]
