Search for: "Burden v. Thomas" Results 321 - 340 of 2,239
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 May 2022, 4:48 pm by INFORRM
Read Hacked Off’s response here; The Data Reform Bill, which will aim to reduce “burdens” faced by data-handling companies under laws like GDPR. [read post]
3 May 2022, 7:33 am by Michael C. Dorf
Moreover, the oral argument last December strongly indicated that five Justices—Thomas, Alito, Gorsuch, Kavanaugh, and Barrett—were inclined to overrule Roe v. [read post]
24 Apr 2022, 4:19 pm by INFORRM
On Tuesday 12 April 2022, there were hearings in the cases of BW Legal Services Limited v Glassdoor, Inc before Jay J; Dudley v Phillips before Saini J, and; XXX v Persons Unknown before Chamberlain J. [read post]
14 Apr 2022, 6:40 am by jonathanturley
Justice Clarence Thomas and Justice Neil Gorsuch objected recently to the denial of certiorari in Berisha v. [read post]
11 Apr 2022, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
In the American system, parents shoulder the burden of childrearing. [read post]
10 Apr 2022, 4:56 pm by INFORRM
The post cites the costs to privacy, freedom of speech (such as the ‘legal but harmful’ concept), the ‘duty of care’ demanded of online service providers to limit or even ban both encryption and anonymity, the political control of censorship via Ofcom, and the “mammoth and costly bureaucratic burdens being foisted on people operating online services” as some of the many reasons that the proposed Bill might be doing more harm than good. [read post]
3 Apr 2022, 8:50 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
The Supreme Court of British Columbia wrestled with this very issue in a recent decision in Thomas and Saik’uz First Nation v Rio Tinto Alcan Inc. [read post]