Search for: "C. King v. State" Results 321 - 340 of 1,303
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jan 2015, 8:39 am by Andrew Frisch
King Packing Co., 350 U.S. 260, 262, 76 S.Ct. 337, 100 L.Ed. 282—and Department of Labor regulations are consistent with this approach, see 29 CFR §§ 790.8(c), 790.7(g). [read post]
6 Feb 2022, 1:30 pm
’’ Despite the choice of law provision, George Frank unilaterally added the following language at the end of paragraph 19: ‘‘Since this is a contract for an agreement taking place in the state of Connecticut, Connecticut laws will supersede those of California. [read post]
17 Dec 2014, 3:40 am by Amy Howe
Circuit put that appeal on hold after the Court granted review in a similar challenge, King v. [read post]
18 Apr 2010, 5:47 am by Mark Zamora
P. 30(c)(2).The instruction not to answer on 30(b)(6) scope grounds was improper because FSI was not seeking to preserve a privilege, enforce a limitation ordered by the court or in order to present a motion under Rule 30(d)(3).[ 2 ]The two leading cases on the scope of a Rule 30(b)(6) deposition are King v. [read post]
19 Apr 2017, 4:57 am
I set out very brief overview of a handful of the many interesting cases highlighted by the speaker.Phonographic Performance Ltd v Hagan [2016] EWHC 3076 (IPEC), HHJ Hacon (Procedure) This case arguably caused the most surprise in the room on the night, particularly for those who regularly litigate in the IPEC (where costs are king). [read post]
3 May 2015, 10:33 pm
 After all, "holiday" is no more than a state of mind, surely. [read post]
18 Sep 2020, 1:10 am by Michael Douglas
Facebook Inc applied to set aside the orders for its service in the United States, among other things. [read post]
12 Aug 2022, 3:44 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
 SG filed only 2 amicus briefs in 20th c private litigant cases (CCNV, Quality King), but amicus in all but 2 of 21st century cases—pretty big shift. [read post]