Search for: "C.D.1"
Results 321 - 340
of 1,401
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Mar 2020, 1:33 pm
Supp. 2d 1099 (C.D. [read post]
18 Mar 2020, 10:29 am
C.D. [read post]
11 Mar 2020, 10:31 am
DishNetwork LLC, No. 09-3073, Slip op. at 4-5 (C.D. [read post]
10 Mar 2020, 6:30 am
(C.D. [read post]
8 Mar 2020, 1:35 am
(C.D. [read post]
7 Mar 2020, 8:56 am
Google, LLC, 2:19-cv-06444-SVW-RAO (C.D. [read post]
26 Feb 2020, 11:47 am
Section 2(a) Price Discrimination – Elements The elements of a Section 2(a) claim are usually summarized as prohibiting (1) a difference in price (2) in reasonably contemporaneous sales to two buyers purchasing from a single seller, (3) involving commodities, (4) of like grade and quality (5) that may injure competition. [read post]
22 Feb 2020, 9:11 am
Zillow Group, Inc., 2020 WL 774354 (C.D. [read post]
18 Feb 2020, 9:20 am
P. 1. [read post]
15 Feb 2020, 6:56 am
2020 WL 70831 (C.D. [read post]
12 Feb 2020, 5:34 pm
Supp.3d 978, 993 (C.D. [read post]
31 Jan 2020, 6:05 am
The claimant, A.B., is the 15-year-old child of the respondents, C.D. and E.F. [read post]
28 Jan 2020, 3:05 am
., 144 F.Supp.3d 1114, 1135 (C.D. [read post]
23 Jan 2020, 10:37 pm
The only broken hearts, however, were those of the plaintiffs’ lawyers and their expert witnesses who saw their litigation claims excluded and dismissed.[1] Then came claims that the PDE5i medications caused non-arteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy (“NAION”), based upon a dubious epidemiologic study by Dr. [read post]
21 Jan 2020, 5:03 am
Broquard, No. 2:16-cv-09561 (C.D. [read post]
7 Jan 2020, 12:31 pm
CV 17-7435-JFW (EX), 2018 WL 4945643, at *4–5 (C.D. [read post]
30 Dec 2019, 8:09 am
., No. 8:19-cv-00878-JLS-DFM, 2019 WL 6887173 (C.D. [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 4:17 pm
Although regulators may be unwilling to sign NDAs, they frequently offer procedures by which a party submitting proprietary information to them can designate the information as not to be made public In Part II, we will explore patent protection in the cannabis industry. [1] See, e.g., Cal. [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 4:00 pm
This guidance closely tracks IRS Notice 2018-88 and provides that an ICHRA offers “affordable” coverage if the difference between the amount of the reimbursement available through the ICHRA and the cost of self-only coverage for the lowest cost silver plan available to the employee on the ACA Exchange (in other words, an employee’s out-of-pocket cost for coverage on the ACA Exchange after reimbursement from the ICHRA, if the employee purchases the lowest cost silver plan) does not… [read post]
21 Nov 2019, 3:24 pm
LEXIS 142174 at *18 (C.D. [read post]
