Search for: "Canon Inc." Results 321 - 340 of 663
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jan 2017, 11:13 pm by Marie-Andree Weiss
AutobotsBack in July 2016, Disney took three Chinese firms (Blue MTV, media company Beijing G-Point and PPLive Inc.) to court for copyright infringement of ‘Cars’, the main protagonist of which being ‘Lightning McQueen’.An ancestor of Lightning McQueen? [read post]
23 Feb 2014, 4:20 pm by Marty Lederman
Piggie Park Enterprises, Inc. (1968), and United States v. [read post]
26 Sep 2022, 12:20 pm by Verónica Rodríguez Arguijo
When comparing virtual vs physical goods/services to assess the similarity, do the so-called CANON factors apply by analogy? [read post]
16 Jan 2011, 7:36 am by Vincent LoTempio
(see chart below World Wide Ownership of US Patents 2010) Top-50 US Patent Assignees in 2010 (As reported by IFI) International Business Machines Corp 5896 Samsung Electronics Co Ltd (Korea) 4551 Microsoft Corp 3094 Canon K K (Japan) 2552 Panasonic Corp (Japan) 2482 Toshiba Corp (Japan) 2246 Sony Corp (Japan) 2150 Intel Corp 1653 LG Electronics Inc (Korea) 1490 Hewlett-Packard Development Co L P 1480 Hitachi Ltd (Japan) 1460 Seiko… [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 7:42 pm by Mary Whisner
Lucent, 331 F.Supp.2d 290 (D.N.J. 2004).Why ban sharia and not canon law or Jewish law or the law of any foreign jurisdiction? [read post]
Cabela’s Retail, Inc., a transgender woman filed Title VII and ADA claims against her former employer claiming that she had suffered disability discrimination and retaliation based on her gender dysphoria. [read post]
1 Apr 2009, 7:40 pm
Of course, textualists observe the Absurdity canon (although John Manning argues that they oughtn't). [read post]
2 Jan 2014, 6:00 am by LTA-Editor
WKJG, Inc., which noted that “copyright protection does not extend to ideas, plots, dramatic situations and events,” Klinger argued that the new stories are events, not characteristics of the Holmes or Watson characters. [read post]
23 Jul 2014, 1:56 pm
PPG Industries, Inc., 446 U.S. 578, 592 (1980) (“it would be a strange canon of statutory construction that would require Congress to state in committee reports or elsewhere in its deliberations that which is obvious on the face of a statute”). [read post]