Search for: "Clark v. Doe" Results 321 - 340 of 2,358
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Apr 2021, 5:55 am by Kevin Kaufman
Table 1: Selected County and Municipal Rental Car Excise Taxes State Locality Car Rental Excise Tax  Funding Purpose Alaska Anchorage 8% City general fund Arizona Maricopa County (Phoenix) The greater of 3.25% or $2.50 per rental Glendale Stadium; youth & amateur sports Arizona Pima County (Tucson) $3.50 Kino Sports Complex Colorado Denver 7.25% Colorado Convention Center Georgia Atlanta 10% State Farm Arena Illinois Chicago 6% and 9% transaction tax (a) City general fund Indiana Marion… [read post]
8 Apr 2021, 9:52 am by Eric Goldman
Thus, being denied permission to use a work does not weigh against a finding of fair use. [read post]
22 Mar 2021, 5:37 pm by INFORRM
Mr Soriano sought to challenge this, arguing that the lower ‘good arguable case’ test should apply, as it does in classic forum conveniens determinations. [read post]
22 Mar 2021, 8:01 am by William Ford, Victoria Gallegos
Richard Clarke, commander of Special Operations Command; and Gen. [read post]
18 Mar 2021, 8:39 am by Mark Ashton
 The regulation does need to assiduously avoid “content preference,” Clark v. [read post]
18 Mar 2021, 8:39 am by Mark Ashton
 The regulation does need to assiduously avoid “content preference,” Clark v. [read post]
19 Feb 2021, 11:04 am by Eugene Volokh
William Funk (Lewis & Clark), Ofer Raban (U. of Oregon), and Kyu Ho Youm (U. of Oregon); and bloggers Prof. [read post]
1 Feb 2021, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Roberts’s characterization of Casey as “intrinsically sounder” than Hellerstedt jumps out, as does his quotation of Gonzales v. [read post]
29 Jan 2021, 5:01 am by Jonathan Shaub
The most famous case on executive privilege is United States v. [read post]
21 Jan 2021, 4:36 pm by INFORRM
The decision of Mr Justice Jay in Soriano v Forensic News LLC  [2021] EWHC 56 (QB) is interesting in a number of respects but in particular for its analysis of the circumstances in which the GDPR will apply to a publisher (or indeed any data controller/processor) based outside of the EU. [read post]