Search for: "Constitution Party of Alabama"
Results 321 - 340
of 1,074
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Feb 2020, 11:00 pm
The Court held that a party’s electors may be required to pledge that they will vote for their party’s nominee without running afoul of the Constitution. [read post]
30 Jan 2020, 2:49 am
The rest of it seems like practical awareness of the state they are representing.Breaking with party leaders is becoming increasingly rare on big questions like impeachment and critical confirmation fights. [read post]
23 Jan 2020, 7:24 am
Nicholas Mosvick is a Senior Fellow for Constitutional Content at the National Constitution Center. [read post]
10 Jan 2020, 2:44 pm
The Court held that the initial fraudulent email, combined with the later email from the supposed attorney, provided enough detail to constitute a “fraudulent instruction. [read post]
10 Jan 2020, 2:44 pm
The Court held that the initial fraudulent email, combined with the later email from the supposed attorney, provided enough detail to constitute a “fraudulent instruction. [read post]
20 Dec 2019, 8:49 am
January On January 4, the justices injected considerable interest into what had been a fairly humdrum 2018-2019 term with the announcement that they would once again tackle the issue of partisan gerrymandering – that is, the practice of drawing redistricting maps to give one political party an advantage at another party’s expense. [read post]
13 Dec 2019, 3:30 am
Meadowmoor Dairies, Inc.; (2) if the speech targeted a neutral party, Carpenters and Joiners Union of Am., Local No. 213 v. [read post]
12 Dec 2019, 5:45 am
Simplified Seller Use Taxes, like those adopted in Alabama and Louisiana, try to address one constitutional concern (undue burden) by substituting another (discriminatory taxation), in some cases imposing higher rates on remote sellers than are faced by in-state merchants. [read post]
11 Dec 2019, 12:19 pm
They are Maryland, Virginia, North Carolina, and Alabama. [read post]
3 Dec 2019, 10:16 pm
” Amicus parties try to “help” the court reach its decision by offering facts, analysis, or perspective that the parties to the case have not. [read post]
26 Nov 2019, 2:19 pm
Other courts have ruled that such laws are constitutional, most significantly the 2nd Circuit U.S. [read post]
14 Nov 2019, 9:01 pm
And so, following primary elections, the Republican Party nominated in his place Lieutenant Governor Tate Reeves. [read post]
18 Oct 2019, 6:30 am
They included the House Un-American Activities Committee and other McCarthyite organizations (including some within the Executive Branch); as well as the white men on the Alabama jury in New York Times v. [read post]
15 Oct 2019, 1:01 am
Henry De Lamar Clayton of Alabama introduced the Clayton Antitrust Bill to regulate massive corporations. [read post]
11 Oct 2019, 3:00 am
The campaign released a plan to “get corporate money out of politics,” a proposal that would eliminate big-dollar fundraising for all federal elections, enact a constitutional amendment to declare campaign contributions are not speech, and take aim at the Democratic National Convention. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 10:21 am
The court rejected his argument and ruled that non-unanimous verdicts are constitutional. [read post]
11 Sep 2019, 9:18 am
Alabama and Montgomery v. [read post]
6 Sep 2019, 3:00 am
A president who knowingly directed government officials to break the law and dangled pardons to appease them would constitute an abuse of power, Judiciary Committee Chairperson Jerrold Nadler said. [read post]
5 Sep 2019, 12:53 pm
Repeatedly, however, the Supreme Court has rejected these arguments by, among other things, acknowledging that: Male employees can invoke the protections against sex discrimination, even if they weren’t the primary intended beneficiaries; actions short of termination, including workplace harassment, constitute discrimination; and discrimination can occur even when the parties involved share the same protected characteristic, as in the case of same-sex sexual harassment. [read post]
4 Sep 2019, 4:39 pm
Suing gun manfacturers for third-party misuse is no more legitimate that suing printing presses for third-party misuse. [read post]
