Search for: "Core v. Ohio" Results 321 - 340 of 457
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Apr 2012, 5:43 pm by Colin O'Keefe
-Hartford attorney Daniel Schwartz of Pullman & Comley in his Connecticut Employment Law Blog Supreme Court Affirms Kappos v. [read post]
6 Apr 2012, 7:00 am by Lucas A. Ferrara, Esq.
The  EEOC filed suit (Civil Action No.1:11-c v-00042-SJD) in U.S. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 6:12 pm by SO Issues
Margie Slagle (Web Site) wrote an amicus brief representing the Cleveland and Texas rape crisis centers in the Williams v Ohio case. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 7:24 am by Sasha Volokh
Accountability Concerns I’ve already alluded to the argument that private providers are less accountable—in other words, that contracting out for prison management violates core commitments of public law. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 7:42 am by David Wagner
If emissions from individual operations such as wells, processing plants and compressor stations are combined, they could constitute a “major stationary source” or a “major facility” for purposes of the Prevention of Significant Deterioration, New Source Review and Title V permitting programs under the Clean Air Act. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 9:56 am by Susan Brenner
Smith, 920 N.E.2d 949 (Ohio Supreme Court 2009.] [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 7:56 am by Peter Landers
Ohio, describing his view of hard-core pornography. [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 9:35 pm by Jeff Gamso
Thus, “the perplexing if not often shocking departures from the core components of the execution process that are set forth in the written protocol” appear to be relegated to the past, obviating the conclusion that Ohio’s execution practices offend the Constitution based on irrationality and disturb fundamental rights that the law bestows on every individual regardless of the depraved nature of his or her crimes.Yeah, well, maybe. [read blog]
6 Nov 2011, 9:35 pm by Jeff Gamso
Thus, “the perplexing if not often shocking departures from the core components of the execution process that are set forth in the written protocol” appear to be relegated to the past, obviating the conclusion that Ohio’s execution practices offend the Constitution based on irrationality and disturb fundamental rights that the law bestows on every individual regardless of the depraved nature of his or her crimes.Yeah, well, maybe. [read post]
15 Oct 2011, 4:43 am by Mandelman
  So, plotting data on a ‘V” shaped model but having it turn out to be a different letter of  the alphabet, is a like drawing the route New Jersey on a map of Australia. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 3:00 pm by Amy Howe
  Environmental concerns also are at the core of the third case, Pacific Merchant Shipping Association v. [read post]