Search for: "Cox v. Amend"
Results 321 - 340
of 563
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jan 2014, 4:49 pm
The case was the subject of considerable controversy among defenders of Internet speech, after a federal district court judge in Oregon ruled that the blogger, Crystal Cox, was not entitled to First Amendment protection under the Supreme Court's decision in Gertz v. [read post]
17 Jan 2014, 2:18 pm
Holding that even bloggers -- not just the institutional press -- are protected by the First Amendment holding in Gertz, and that as a result, a plaintiff who sues 'em for defamation for posts that involve a public concern needs to demonstrate actual (not merely presumed) damages as well as negligence on the part of the blogger.Law blogger Eugene Volokh (The Volokh Conspiracy) represented the defendant on appeal, and law blogger Tom Goldstein (SCOTUSblog) filed an amicus brief. [read post]
17 Jan 2014, 11:42 am
Cox, representing herself, raised some First Amendment defenses. [read post]
17 Jan 2014, 10:34 am
Cox (9th Cir. [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 7:41 am
Levine, 555 U.S. 555 (2009), and PLIVA v. [read post]
21 Oct 2013, 2:32 pm
(Lawson v. [read post]
15 Sep 2013, 9:28 am
LEXIS 111365 (SD NY, Aug. 7, 2013), a New York federal district court dismissed a suit by a Muslim inmate who complained that he could not attend Friday Jumu'ah services while he was in disciplinary confinement.In Cox v. [read post]
13 Sep 2013, 6:00 am
Cox Retirement Properties, 2013 OK 37, 302 P.3d 789. [read post]
11 Sep 2013, 10:51 am
(See also the Cox case from last month: "Facebook Posting That Someone Has Herpes Is Criminal Harassment--Pennsylvania v. [read post]
30 Aug 2013, 10:01 am
COX, et al., Appellees. 3rd District.Estates -- Wills -- Revocation -- Error to dismiss second amended petition for revocation of probate of will in which petitioner alleged that, due to undue influence and testamentary incapacity based upon lack of capacity and insane delusions, all wills executed by decedent after a 1983 will in which petitioner was beneficiary were invalid -- Petitioner pleaded sufficient allegations of standingMARLENE GORDON, Appellant, v. [read post]
20 Aug 2013, 10:17 am
In Jews for Jesus v. [read post]
12 Aug 2013, 8:18 am
Foreword: Buckley v. [read post]
3 Aug 2013, 12:06 pm
(See, e.g., US v. [read post]
29 Jul 2013, 7:45 am
” In United States v. [read post]
15 Jul 2013, 5:42 pm
Leslie, et al. v. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 1:41 pm
Strangelove" (16) "Flight of the Conchords" (4) "Game Change" (2) "Get Smart" (1) "Gran Torino" (10) "Grey Gardens" (13) "I Shouldn't Be Alive" (4) "Limelight" (3) "Meet the Press" (20) "Moby Dick" (5) "My Dinner with Andre" (34) "Mystery Science Theater" (2) "Project Runway" (78) "Romy and Michele's High School Reunion" (3) "Seinfeld" (72) "Sex and the City" (14) "Slacker" (11) "Slumdog Millionaire" (16) "SNL" (60) "Sopranos" (50) "South Park" (71) "Star Trek" (12) "Star Wars" (25) "Survivor" (50)… [read post]
22 Jun 2013, 6:52 pm
Rebecca L.Kurz won in State v. [read post]
19 Jun 2013, 4:30 am
Cox v. [read post]
18 Jun 2013, 1:12 pm
You can read the Court's opinion in Janie Doe v. [read post]
