Search for: "Cross v. Blue Cross/Blue Shield"
Results 321 - 340
of 351
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jan 2009, 12:48 pm
The complaint alleged that Baptist Health conspired with Arkansas Blue Cross and Blue Shield to restrain trade in, and to monopolize, the market for “cardiology services for privately insured patients in a 16 county area of central Arkansas. [read post]
28 Dec 2008, 5:35 pm
Anthem Blue Cross and Blue Shield Southern District of Ohio at Cincinnati 08a0454p.06 USA v. [read post]
28 Dec 2008, 5:35 pm
Anthem Blue Cross and Blue Shield Southern District of Ohio at Cincinnati 08a0454p.06 USA v. [read post]
14 Nov 2008, 11:44 am
Blue Cross Blue Shield of Massachusetts, 08-1287. [read post]
16 Sep 2008, 12:00 pm
Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Ala., Inc., 890 F.2d 1137, 1140 (11th Cir. 1989)). [read post]
6 Aug 2008, 3:14 pm
Blue Cross and Blue Shield of North Carolina, Judge Jolly certified a class action against health insurer Blue Cross. [read post]
10 Jul 2008, 6:25 pm
Kornowicz's request, acknowledging its legal obligation to recognize her marriage, and passed it on to Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Western New York, the insurance company that provides group health insurance coverage to employees of the school district under a group insurance contract. [read post]
2 Jun 2008, 9:28 am
Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Mich., Inc., 740 F.2d 423, 428 (6th Cir. 1984) (holding denial of rule 56(f) motion improper where party moving for summary judgment had not been "extremely forthcoming" with respect to document requests and interlocutory appeal had interrupted discovery); see also 10B Charles Alan Wright, Arthur R. [read post]
12 May 2008, 2:37 pm
In this antitrust case, we consider the legality of an agreement between non-party Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan ("BCBSM") and the Defendants-Appellees, Wright & Filippis, Inc. and its subsidiary ABP Administration, Inc. [read post]
3 Mar 2008, 6:00 am
Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Texas, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Feb 2008, 9:00 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at [duncanbucknell.com]Highlights this week included:EU wants 95 year copyright on recordings: (IPKat), (Ars Technica), (Intellectual Property Watch), (IP Law360),Harvard Arts and Sciences Faculty decides to allow open access to research: (Techdirt), (Michael Geist), (Ars Technica), (Against Monopoly),Summary judgment hearing 8 Feb: Tafas & GSK v Dudas concerning implementation of the USPTO’s new… [read post]
13 Feb 2008, 12:58 am
Blue Cross Blue Shield v. [read post]
29 Jan 2008, 6:00 am
Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Texas, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Jan 2008, 7:18 am
Blue Cross Blue Shield of Massachusetts, which basically reads as a mini-treatise on a number of interesting issues arising in ERISA litigation. [read post]
27 Dec 2007, 6:53 pm
Blue Cross and Blue Shield Association, et al. [read post]
17 Dec 2007, 8:18 am
Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Mass., Inc., 292 F.3d 57, 59 (1st Cir. 2002)), the Copyright Act does not encompass all claims simply because the parties' dispute happens to involve a copyrighted work. [read post]
11 Dec 2007, 9:19 pm
The principal rationales for the doctrine include: (1) assuring the enforceability of any decision that may be rendered against the fugitive; (2) imposing a penalty for flouting the judicial process; (3) discouraging flights from justice and promoting the efficient operation of the courts; and (4) avoiding prejudice to the non-fugitive party (Empire Blue Cross & Blue Shield v Finkelstein, 111 F3d 278, 280 [2d Cir 1997]). . . [read post]
16 Oct 2007, 5:28 am
The court ordered sanctioned defendants and their counsel as follows: Keystone - 25%; Capital Blue Cross - 25%; defense counsel John S. [read post]
22 Sep 2007, 8:09 am
Blue Cross of MI Eastern District of Michigan at DetroitALGENON L. [read post]
14 Aug 2007, 2:22 am
Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Florida, Inc., 19 F.3d 562, 566-67 (11th Cir.1994)); see also United States ex rel. [read post]
