Search for: "Cross v. Powers"
Results 321 - 340
of 4,828
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jun 2023, 6:34 am
Bar Assoc. v. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 9:30 pm
Testimony was taken for the record, and witnesses were subject to cross examination. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 8:41 am
The University of Chicago law school website shows 62 "full time reaching faculty" v. 127 "Lecturers in Law" (another—and, to some ears, a more dignified—term for adjuncts). [read post]
4 Jun 2023, 6:30 am
” As In A Bad State teaches us, federal policy and jurisprudence can create powerful incentives that direct state and local policy in a particular direction. [read post]
2 Jun 2023, 5:34 am
A short version, though, is that, a little more than 50 years ago, in Lemon v. [read post]
1 Jun 2023, 11:43 am
Vidal v. [read post]
31 May 2023, 5:20 am
The decision in Michigan v. [read post]
31 May 2023, 5:01 am
The best-known instance and illustration of Justice Breyer's church-state intuitions is his concurring opinion in Van Orden v. [read post]
30 May 2023, 4:03 pm
Tyler v. [read post]
30 May 2023, 5:01 am
From Anonymous v. [read post]
24 May 2023, 10:16 am
Instead, the River peters out shortly after crossing the border into Mexico. [read post]
23 May 2023, 12:58 am
The article reported on criminal proceedings at which Mr Seeley had given evidence for the prosecution, focusing on an allegation which had been put to Mr Seeley in cross-examination. [read post]
22 May 2023, 12:48 pm
Early v. [read post]
21 May 2023, 9:00 pm
Just yesterday he said that he thinks he has the authority to override the debt ceiling if push comes to shove but is not sure the Constitution “could be invoked in time,” presumably because he thinks it would take time for the inevitable lawsuits to be resolved.But of course the Constitution (whether the Fourteenth Amendment or, as we think more persuasively, the separation of powers) could be invoked in time. [read post]
21 May 2023, 12:28 pm
Preferably, there will be minimal resort to war powers for expelling freedom-seekers, but (as I wrote), "It is unfortunate that the civil power of the states has been so constricted by judicial error that we have to discuss the military power now as well, and the civil power alone might be sufficient were it not for cases like Arizona v. [read post]
19 May 2023, 9:39 am
In South Africa, the High Court found that “no lawful authority has been demonstrated to trespass onto the privacy rights or the freedom of expression rights of anyone, including South Africans whose communications cross-cross the world by means of bulk [read post]
18 May 2023, 7:04 am
State v. [read post]
17 May 2023, 2:29 am
HMRC now appeals to the Supreme Court and SSE cross-appeals. [read post]
11 May 2023, 5:01 am
The Treasury Department filed its cross-motion for summary judgment and motion in opposition on May 3. [read post]
10 May 2023, 2:30 pm
From Collins v. [read post]
