Search for: "Cross v. State"
Results 321 - 340
of 16,690
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 May 2024, 9:01 am
., Lubbe v Cape, Lungowe v Vedanta, Okpabi v Shell, etc.). [read post]
11 May 2024, 6:56 am
The third focuses cognitive control of target populations of competitor or target states (and other collectives) connected to "cold war. [read post]
10 May 2024, 10:45 am
"Mandated economic self-sufficiency from state and refugee perspectives: refugee integration policy and practice in Sweden and New Zealand," Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, Latest Articles, 1 May 2024 [open access] Plan Nacional de Reasentamiento y Vías Complementarias de Admisión a la República Argentina para personas refugiadas, apátridas y necesitadas de protección internacional (Comisión Nacional Para Los… [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:01 am
Circuit’s application of the Fitzgerald test in Blassingame v. [read post]
10 May 2024, 7:00 am
Facts – This case (Martin-Viana v. [read post]
10 May 2024, 2:30 am
On these facts the cross-reference to Kern was too general, and the anticipation attack failed (neither document alone contained a clear and unambiguous disclosure). [read post]
9 May 2024, 9:32 am
State v. [read post]
9 May 2024, 6:05 am
Weinstein also chose not to testify after the judge granted prosecutors permission to cross-examine him about a wide range of uncharged conduct, in rulings that gave the state’s highest court pause. [read post]
9 May 2024, 5:55 am
Second, based on the first conclusion, and as established by the ICJ in Bosnia v. [read post]
8 May 2024, 4:51 am
Corp. v Insurance Co. of N. [read post]
8 May 2024, 4:05 am
In Yellowhammer Fund v. [read post]
7 May 2024, 2:47 pm
Almost 30 years ago, SCOTUS issued its opinion in United States v. [read post]
7 May 2024, 2:19 pm
" Paul v. [read post]
7 May 2024, 12:30 pm
Bissonnette v. [read post]
7 May 2024, 9:31 am
This is recognized in the State Department’s Foreign Affairs Manual (FAM) at 9 FAM § 402.1-3 , which states that an “applicant desiring to come to the United States for one principal purpose, and one or more incidental purposes, must be classified in accordance with the principal purpose. [read post]
7 May 2024, 7:12 am
Per another Supreme Court precedent, United States v. [read post]
7 May 2024, 6:12 am
P’ship v. [read post]
6 May 2024, 9:00 pm
However, to paraphrase Justice Stephen Breyer, writing in Heffernan v. [read post]
6 May 2024, 8:39 am
In addition, most of the cultural goods looted during World War II crossed multiple borders. [read post]
6 May 2024, 7:38 am
It approved the US approach (Hilton v Guyot) to the effect that: ‘The application of the doctrine of comity means that the recognition of foreign decisions is not out of obligation, but rather out of convenience and utility’ [para 59]. [read post]