Search for: "DOLL V. STATE"
Results 321 - 340
of 391
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Dec 2022, 11:20 am
NOCO v. [read post]
30 Sep 2012, 8:51 pm
Ringgold v. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 9:01 pm
In an early case, Willingham v. [read post]
1 Dec 2009, 7:53 am
Such a doll. [read post]
4 Oct 2021, 10:58 am
Similarly, Sulzer Mixpac AG v. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 7:28 pm
State of Maryland, D. [read post]
23 Jan 2009, 1:00 am
(Managing Intellectual Property) (Law360) (Out-Law) ECJ rules German music distributor cannot sell two Bob Dylan compilation albums because Sony owns rights to songs in question: Sony Music Entertainment (Germany) GmbH v Falcon Neue Medien Vertrieb GmbH (IPKat) (Law360) ECJ: Date set for Advocate General’s opinion in L'Oréal SA, Lancôme parfums et beauté & Cie SNC, Laboratoire Garnier & Cie v Bellure NV, Malaika… [read post]
27 Dec 2007, 7:30 am
., a wayback machine entry dated before the critical date, the same evidence is - at this point - unlikely to be admissible in court due to hearsay issues.AFAIK, the wayback machine has overcome hearsay objections in only one case (Telewizja Polska United States v. [read post]
30 May 2008, 9:09 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: WHO members near accord on global strategy on IP and health: (Intellectual Property Watch), (GenericsWeb), (Gowlings), (IAM), Copiepresse seeks up to €49 million from Google in lawsuit over right to feature links to publishers’ content on internet: (IPKat), (Ars Technica), (Techdirt), (Out-Law), (IP Law360) Singapore ‘image… [read post]
3 Apr 2009, 7:23 pm
LLC v W. [read post]
30 Nov 2012, 3:19 am
She sued under California state law. [read post]
23 May 2008, 1:03 am
Here is IP Think Tank’s weekly selection of top intellectual property news breaking in the blogosphere and internet. [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 3:00 am
Anjani Kumar Goenka & Anr (IP Frontline) Hollywood v Bollywood v Tollywood: When is ‘plagiarism’ equal to ‘copyright infringement’? [read post]
27 May 2018, 4:36 pm
The Pussycat Dolls are bringing a lawsuit against the Daily Mail’s parent company following the Mail Online publishing an article describing the band as a “prostitution ring” by former member Kaya Jones. [read post]
9 Apr 2009, 9:27 am
(Promote the Progress) N D Illinois one step closer to adopting patent rules (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) Innovate Texas Foundation launched to accelerate state’s IP commercialisation (Technology Transfer Tactics) Special Masters a [read post]
18 May 2009, 5:24 am
’ (China Law Blog) Europe ECJ finds similar marks on wine and glasses not likely to cause confusion: Waterford Wedgewood plc v Assembled Investments (Proprietary) Ltd, OHIM (Class 46) (IPKat) AG Colomer opines in Maple leaf trade mark battle: joined cases American Clothing Associates SA v OHIM and OHIM v American Clothing Associates SA (IPKat) (Excess Copyright) CFI: Restitutio and time limits: how does the law stand now for CTMs? [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 10:14 am
This position is to be contrasted with other jurisdictions such as the United States which has varying degrees of protection for personality rights and the right of publicity at state level. [read post]
19 Feb 2017, 4:02 pm
Surveillance and Information Gathering Germany’s Federal Network Agency, or Bundesnetzagentur, has banned Genesis Toys’ Cayla doll as an illegal surveillance device. [read post]
17 Oct 2008, 2:40 pm
(IP Dragon) Bad faith trade mark registrations: Sony Ericsson v Mr Lui (IPKat) In letter to Chinese government, Intellectual Property Owners Association (IPOA) weakens opposition to 'international exhaustion' (Hal Wegner) IP laws evolving in China (Law360) Colombia Colombia changes trade name deposit requirements (IP tango) FINESSE, MEN'S FITNESS confusingly similar, rules Colombia Council (IP tango) Denmark Court denies injunction request in… [read post]
9 Jan 2009, 7:00 am
Volkswagon-based transfer mandamus order in In re TS Tech USA (Inventive Step) (Hal Wegner) (EDTexweblog.com) (EDTexweblog.com) (Washington State Patent Law Blog) (Patently-O) (Law360) (Patent Prospector) ECJ decides Obelix too famous to be confused with MOBILIX mobile phone service: Les Éditions Albert René Sàrl v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market, Orange A/S (Class 46) (IPKat) Global Global – General Moral… [read post]
