Search for: "David Clinton v. State"
Results 321 - 340
of 416
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jun 2010, 6:19 am
David Savage of the Los Angeles Times recounts the confirmation battles of Nixon nominee G. [read post]
24 May 2010, 9:51 am
But it was the Supreme Court's 2008 decision in a Kentucky case, Baze v. [read post]
21 May 2010, 7:19 am
Finally, Wendy Kaminer has a piece for the Atlantic on the federal sex offender case, United States v. [read post]
20 May 2010, 8:09 am
Florida and United States v. [read post]
17 May 2010, 9:40 am
The hearings will occur in the aftermath of the Supreme Court's pending decision in McDonald v. [read post]
13 May 2010, 5:28 am
Paul, Rust v. [read post]
12 May 2010, 12:34 pm
The American Constitution Society’s Indianapolis Chapter hosted a discussion of the Supreme Court of the United State’s decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
10 May 2010, 2:52 pm
That is more the function of state Supreme Court judges dealing with issues of state constitutional, statutory and common law, and even they are frequently constrained by federal constitutional law and federal preemption of state law. [read post]
7 May 2010, 10:00 pm
Paul, Rust v. [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 7:31 am
By: David A. [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 6:50 am
The biggest news out of the Court yesterday was the opinion in United States v. [read post]
15 Apr 2010, 12:02 pm
That is what the Supreme Court said as well in Hamdi v. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 10:14 am
Powell and Harry Blackmun (Nixon), David H. [read post]
14 Mar 2010, 10:47 pm
Labor Secretary Hilda Solis by OSHA chief David Michaels and Deborah Greenfield, acting deputy solicitor of the department. [read post]
10 Mar 2010, 12:29 am
The case, Lawyers Funds for Client Protection v. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 3:17 pm
This Settlement Agreement proposes to compromise a claim the United States has at this Site for Past Response Costs, as those terms are defined in the Settlement Agreement. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 2:56 am
The High Court ruled, in Clinton David Jacobs v Motor Insurers' Bureau [2010] EWHC 231 (QB), that under European Union Regulation 864/2007 (Rome II), Spanish law applied in the case of a UK resident seeking compensation for serious injuries sustained in Spain, at the hands of an uninsured driver, then resident in Spain.The claimant issued proceedings against the defendant, the Motor Insurers' Bureau, in its capacity as a compensatory body under the Motor Vehicles… [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 2:56 am
The High Court ruled, in Clinton David Jacobs v Motor Insurers' Bureau [2010] EWHC 231 (QB), that under European Union Regulation 864/2007 (Rome II), Spanish law applied in the case of a UK resident seeking compensation for serious injuries sustained in Spain, at the hands of an uninsured driver, then resident in Spain.The claimant issued proceedings against the defendant, the Motor Insurers' Bureau, in its capacity as a compensatory body under the Motor Vehicles… [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 6:33 am
” (The case was originally filed by the Clinton Administration in 1999.) [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 1:12 pm
Leroy V, Inc. [read post]
