Search for: "Dean v. Davis" Results 321 - 340 of 444
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jul 2020, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
In Part One of this series, I explained why last week’s opinions in Chiafalo v. [read post]
29 Nov 2018, 9:00 pm by Vikram David Amar
As the vote tallies for the November 2018 federal elections become finalized, one seat in the House of Representatives may not be resolved for several weeks because of an unusual lawsuit filed by Republican incumbent Bruce Poliquin (along with three Republican voters) in Maine. [read post]
29 Jun 2014, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
Courts can revisit their prior rulings, higher courts can change the legal landscape against which lower courts make decisions (as the Supreme Court in fact did in the immigration regulation setting in 2012 in Arizona v. [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 7:47 am by Kiran Bhat
Johnson of the UC Davis School of Law Dean’s Blog reports that Justice Breyer visited that school several weeks ago. [read post]
31 Aug 2008, 6:01 am
When the Supreme Court granted cert in U.S. v. [read post]
5 Dec 2013, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
”  A state legislature’s constitutional inability to favor particular federal legislative candidates and disfavor others explains why the Supreme Court held a dozen years ago in Cook v. [read post]
29 Aug 2013, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
My biweekly column slot this week roughly coincides with the beginning of the new academic year at most law schools across the country. [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 5:11 pm
SOUTH TEXAS MEDICAL CLINICS, P.A.; from Wharton County; 13th district (13-06-00089-CV, ___ SW3d ___, 01-10-08)08-0191 CONNIE ALLEN, SURVIVING SPOUSE AND LEGAL REPRESENTATIVE OF GRANVILLE DEAN ALLEN v. [read post]
16 Jun 2016, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
Many commentators, including members of Congress and presidents, criticize judicial rulings as being influenced by improper philosophies or even by improper desires to protect partisan interests—think, for example, about the criticism of the conservative majorities in Bush v. [read post]