Search for: "Denis v. Grounds" Results 321 - 340 of 18,122
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Feb 2017, 10:22 am by Patricia Salkin
Defendants denied Plaintiffs’ application on the grounds that the type of facility which Plaintiffs sought to erect was not permitted under the Township’s Zoning Ordinance. [read post]
21 Jun 2012, 12:46 pm by Irene C. Olszewski, Esq.
OPM Would Deny Resolution for Connecticut, Vermont and New Hampshire Plaintiffs The Bi-Partisan Legal Advisory Group (BLAG) has filed a motion to stay the proceeding in Pedersen v. [read post]
30 Nov 2020, 3:38 am
Therefore, the Board concluded that Transcend failed to give fair notice of this defense and so the Board denied its summary judgment motion as to this ground. [read post]
9 Nov 2017, 9:07 pm by Howard Wasserman
And there the lower courts denied relief on standing and Younger grounds, never reaching the First Amendment merits. [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 11:57 am
On appeal, the defendants claim that the court erred in (1) denying their motion for summary judgment on statute of limitations grounds, and (2) granting the plaintiff’s motion to enforce a settlement agreement. [read post]
25 Jul 2007, 1:51 pm
Occasional bouts of intoxication, name calling, and violence against furniture are not enough yet in New York to be granted a divorce [Note: the Court also denied a divorce on the ground of abandonment]. [read post]
9 Mar 2007, 5:01 am
Meredith.From an appeal of a pretrial order denying the defendant's motion for an ex parte hearing regarding pretrial use and disclosure of confidential records he had previously subpoenaed and reviewed in the trial court's chambers, the Court of Special Appeals granted the State's motion to dismiss this interlocutory appeal, on the grounds that the ruling below was not immediately reviewable under the collateral order doctrine.On trial in Montgomery County for… [read post]
29 Sep 2010, 2:10 pm by Matt C. Bailey
On September 27, 2010, the Ninth Circuit reversed a district court order denying certification of a Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions Act (“FACTA”) claim in Bateman v. [read post]