Search for: "Direct Sales Co. v. United States" Results 321 - 340 of 1,025
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jun 2018, 7:06 pm by MOTP
The arbitrator agreed with Rain & Hail that Jody James did not "timely present[] notice of its claim in accordance with the provisions of the crop insurance policy" and, further, "did not state a presentable loss" because crops from performing and non-performing farm units were commingled. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 3:47 pm
In addition, the Commission issued a CID seeking information about cost, pricing, production, and sales of the company’s condoms in the United States and Canada. [read post]
22 Feb 2020, 4:12 am by Chris Wesner
This document has been electronically entered in the records of the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Ohio. [read post]
19 Nov 2007, 1:14 pm
On the other hand, it would be somewhat odd to require that patentees deal with contributory infringers rather than direct infringers. [read post]
21 Jan 2009, 5:23 pm
Revisiting precedent is particularly appropriate where, as here, a departure would not upset settled expectations, see, e.g., United States v. [read post]
29 Dec 2020, 8:00 am by Daniel Nathan
Seven years after Ripple Labs, Inc. first began to sell its digital asset XRP, the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 22, 2020, filed a Complaint in the Southern District of New York against Ripple and its current and former CEOs, alleging that since it began these sales, Ripple has been engaged in an unregistered securities offering through the sale of its XRP token within the United States and worldwide. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 8:12 pm by Christa Culver
United StatesDocket: 10-794Issue(s): When a court allocates the proceeds from a sale pursuant to 26 U.S.C. [read post]
17 Jan 2018, 8:51 am by John Elwood
Garza, 17-654 Issue: Whether, pursuant to United States v. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 7:30 am by W.F. Casey Ebsary, Jr.
Raw Text of Opinion UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION MACKLE VINCENT SHELTON, Petitioner, v. [read post]
1 Oct 2015, 9:30 am by Lyle Denniston
  That 1872 ruling, in the case of United States v. [read post]
19 Sep 2013, 9:53 am by Bexis
 As a result, it is preferable to examine objectively the causal association between promotion and sales using econometric models. [read post]