Search for: "Doe Officers 1-15" Results 321 - 340 of 10,690
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jul 2019, 5:00 am by John Jascob
A merger and acquisition broker is also not exempt from broker-dealer registration if the broker is subject to: (1) Exchange Act Section 15(b) registration-suspension or -revocation provisions; (2) an Exchange Act Section 3(a)(39) statutory disqualification; (3) an SEC Regulation D, Rule 506(d) disqualification; or (4) an Exchange Act Section 15(b)(4)(H) final order. [read post]
30 Mar 2021, 3:01 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Canon 1, 2A, 2B, 3C, and 3C(1), and N.J. [read post]
16 Jan 2013, 3:00 am by LindaMBeale
  See Ben Bernanke: Get Rid of the Debt Ceiling, The Examiner, Jan. 15, 2013 (hat tip to Naked Capitalism's Yves Smith). [read post]
26 Jun 2016, 11:37 am
In the words of the referral— “Does the first sentence of Article 23(1) of [the Regulation] preclude a licensee who is not registered …from bringing proceedings alleging infringement of a Community trade mark? [read post]
9 Dec 2009, 9:42 am
I have a longstanding history of criticizing the Copyright Office, especially its Electronic Copyright Office (ECO) system, which was supposed to make registrations faster and cheaper. [read post]
9 Jun 2014, 3:19 am by Jeremy Saland
Dreyden, 15 NY3d 100 (2010), the court stated: “‘[n]ot every knife is a weapon for purposes of Penal Law §265.01(1))’ (Id. at 103). [read post]
6 Feb 2018, 8:30 am by Josh Blackman
In other words, when an officer engages in purported illegal conduct, and such conduct does not involve government policy, then that conduct is personal in nature. [read post]
9 Jan 2007, 9:18 am
The cover story of the Jan. 1-15, 2007 issue of The New Republic is Damon Linker's article about Mass. [read post]
6 Apr 2021, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
* Many Local Civil Service Commissions and Civil Service Law §15 Personnel Officers have adopted rules or regulations similar to those set out in 4 NYCCR 5.3 applicable to employees in the Classified Service in their respective jurisdictions.** Mari v Safir, 291 AD2d 298, sets out the general standards applied by the courts in resolving litigation flowing from the appointing authority conducting a disciplinary hearing in absentia. [read post]
6 Apr 2021, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
* Many Local Civil Service Commissions and Civil Service Law §15 Personnel Officers have adopted rules or regulations similar to those set out in 4 NYCCR 5.3 applicable to employees in the Classified Service in their respective jurisdictions.** Mari v Safir, 291 AD2d 298, sets out the general standards applied by the courts in resolving litigation flowing from the appointing authority conducting a disciplinary hearing in absentia. [read post]
24 Feb 2014, 2:43 pm
The Act does not apply to government employees or public employers, and it will apply to companies that have 15 or more employees. [read post]
16 Apr 2013, 2:09 pm by Taryn Rucinski
Recently, the Government Accountability Office (GAO) released a report, titled Energy: Federal Support for Renewable and Advanced Energy Technologies GAO-13-514T (Apr. 16, 2013). [read post]
3 May 2019, 3:47 am by Diane Tweedlie
By letter dated 4 December 2014, the applicant filed amended description pages 1 to 22 and amended claims 1 to 15. [read post]
30 Jun 2012, 11:02 pm by Mark Summerfield
  However, by arriving at a conclusion via a circuitous route involving previous Patent Office decisions, the Hearing Officer produces a line of reasoning that just does not add up. [read post]
3 Sep 2018, 2:57 am by Jelle Hoekstra
In a communication pursuant to Article 15(1) RPBA dated 27 July 2017, the board gave its preliminary opinion that Article 122 EPC does not apply in the event of non-compliance with the time limit under Rule 84(1) EPC, in particular because non-compliance with that time limit does not directly cause the loss of a right within the meaning of Article 122(1) EPC. [read post]
4 Apr 2016, 2:35 pm
Between January 15 and February 15, 2012, the account was accessed exclusively from an IP address that was registered to Stephen Gregory in North Carolina. [read post]