Search for: "Doe v. Board of Medical Examiners"
Results 321 - 340
of 750
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jan 2015, 4:54 am
Based on the agreed medical examiner's evaluation of Dahl's whole-person impairment and the 2005 Permanent Disability Rating Schedule, the Workers' Compensation Judge issued Dahl a 59% permanent disability rating. [read post]
29 Mar 2023, 2:50 am
Fig. 3: Plausibility reaches the UK Supreme Court in Warner-Lambert Company LLC v Generics (UK) Ltd While Warner Lambert was a decision made in the context of a second medical use claim, this Case Law was soon also applied to product claims in the UK. [read post]
7 Dec 2013, 6:56 am
Mendel v. [read post]
25 Nov 2013, 9:06 am
Jackson v. [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 5:21 am
State law designates the State Emergency Medical Services Board (EMS Board) to approve CRT courses, conduct examinations, and issue CRT licenses. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 9:07 am
That case is North Carolina State Board of Dental Examiners v. [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 7:23 am
He was found disabled by both the NYCERS Medical Board and an outside health provider after medical examinations. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 10:59 am
The court also rejected the argument that the MOU offered by the applicant to the Board of Supervisors constituted mitigation, finding that there was insufficient basis to conclude that the Board of Supervisors relied upon the MOU as any form of impact mitigation. [read post]
15 Sep 2020, 11:59 am
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit’s opinion in United States v. [read post]
13 Apr 2012, 4:37 am
"That is the premise behind the fight in Valdez v. [read post]
14 Oct 2021, 11:08 am
ShareThe Relist Watch column examines cert petitions that the Supreme Court has “relisted” for its upcoming conference. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 7:30 am
The Second Circuit therefore certified a question to this Court: "Does the 'special duty' requirement—that, to sustain liability in negligence against a municipality, the plaintiff must show that the duty breached is greater than that owed to the public generally—apply to claims of injury inflicted through municipal negligence, or does it apply only when the municipality's negligence lies in its failure to protect the plaintiff from an injury… [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 7:30 am
The Second Circuit therefore certified a question to this Court: "Does the 'special duty' requirement—that, to sustain liability in negligence against a municipality, the plaintiff must show that the duty breached is greater than that owed to the public generally—apply to claims of injury inflicted through municipal negligence, or does it apply only when the municipality's negligence lies in its failure to protect the plaintiff from an injury… [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 10:22 am
Jain is a medical doctor and a board-certified radiologist and has specialized training in Diagnostic Radiology and Musculoskeletal Radiology. [read post]
1 Apr 2016, 3:02 am
March 23, 2016), and Barcal v. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 3:33 pm
ShareThe Relist Watch column examines cert petitions that the Supreme Court has “relisted” for its upcoming conference. [read post]
5 Jan 2010, 8:01 pm
The Connecticut Appellate Court released it's decison on December 1, 2009 in the case of MARJORIE VORONUK v. [read post]
18 Jun 2010, 9:34 pm
Two years ago Bob developed a serious medical condition. [read post]
1 Feb 2008, 12:58 am
Woodbine Board of Education et al"To the extent that he incurred legal fees in his capacity as school board solicitor, plaintiff is not entitled to indemnification under 18A:16-6 or under the board's insurance policy; both afford him protection in his capacity as secretary pro tem. [read post]
6 Nov 2009, 5:40 pm
Florida, being argued at 10, and Sullivan v. [read post]
