Search for: "Doe v. Martin"
Results 321 - 340
of 2,502
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Mar 2015, 5:31 pm
Lake Worth Drainage Dist., for Use & Benefit of Martin, 87 So. 2d 49, 50 (Fla. 1956).In Vega v. [read post]
7 Jan 2014, 7:46 am
Inc. v. [read post]
7 Apr 2015, 4:55 pm
(Chase v News Group Newspapers Ltd) Having earlier observed that cases in the Lewis v Daily Telegraph mould needed to be read in the light of the plurality of the High Court in Favell v Queensland Newspapers, Justice Martin detected the presence of “a significant amount of ‘smoke’,” from the front page. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 10:59 pm
—Houston [14th Dist.] 1996, no writ) (court cannot take action on mediated settlement agreement without an affirmative request to do so through pleadings); see also Martin v. [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 9:07 am
Case citation: Welch v. [read post]
12 Aug 2021, 6:31 am
Circuit Judge James Dennis wrote a strongly worded dissenting opinion arguing that the majority does violence to the text of the Lanham Act by expanding the statute into noncommercial political speech protected by the First Amendment (Alliance for Good Government v. [read post]
29 Jul 2019, 2:30 am
Mr Justice Martin Spencer granted Cape permission to appeal and ordered that the appeal be heard by the Court of Appeal. [read post]
31 May 2024, 8:25 am
This case brought to mind the Martin v. [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 8:36 am
United States v. 300 Units of Rentable Housing, Case No. 09-35990 (9th Cir. [read post]
12 Oct 2006, 2:47 pm
The facts which led to the judgment of the Court of First Instance in Case T-193/04 Hans-Martin Tillack v. [read post]
5 Jul 2009, 4:08 pm
Supreme Court’s Decision in Exxon Shipping Co. v. [read post]
20 May 2015, 3:02 am
In its decision in OPO v. [read post]
11 Dec 2022, 6:13 am
Martin (230 applied) and Mazur v. eBay (230 didn’t). [read post]
18 May 2008, 8:55 am
Martin, 2008 Ga. [read post]
1 Dec 2013, 9:09 pm
This one, from the case of Kissel v. [read post]
22 Apr 2007, 7:03 pm
See, Zoltek Corp. v. [read post]
2 Dec 2009, 4:05 pm
Property Owners' Rebuttal Petitioners' counsel Kent Safiret returned for rebuttal, arguing that Martin doesn't say what the State says it does: First, Martin v. [read post]
16 Jun 2018, 8:45 pm
" -- Martin v. [read post]
