Search for: "Does, 1-13"
Results 321 - 340
of 21,699
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Nov 2014, 9:00 am
Chief Justice Stuart Rabner recently announced that, following the New Jersey Supreme Court's November 13, 2014 order authorizing the Program, the New Jersey Judiciary will begin on January 1, 2015 accepting cases into the Complex Business Litigation Program. [read post]
31 Oct 2013, 7:17 am
Vyrian, Inc., 1-13-cv-11963 (MAD October 29, 2013, Order) (Boal, M.J.) [read post]
9 Dec 2019, 6:52 am
The USPTO also does a good job of posting many of its Examiner Guidance and Training Materials that are available here. [read post]
4 Jun 2015, 2:03 am
The key line:Because this case does not involvefactual findings to which we owe deference under Teva, we again reverse the district court’s constructions of the disputed claim terms and subsequent findings of infringement, and remand for further proceedingslink: http://www.cafc.uscourts.gov/images/stories/opinions-orders/13-1409.Opinion.6-1-2015.1.PDFNote Feb. 2015 IPBiz post CAFC mentions Teva v. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 7:38 am
Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd., et. al., 1-13-cv-00008 (DED March 14, 2013, Order) (Andrews, J.). [read post]
4 May 2016, 6:59 am
Pegasystems Inc., 1-13-cv-00581 (DED May 2, 2016, Order) (Robinson, J.) [read post]
8 Jan 2015, 7:06 am
Perrigo Company et al, 1-13-cv-00236 (DED January 6, 2015, Order) (Andrews, J.) [read post]
5 Sep 2007, 11:07 pm
(p. 13.)All in 29 years, among many other things.How did/does he do it? [read post]
1 Dec 2020, 6:47 am
The Board does not agree with the examining division that the subject-matter of claim 1 of the main request is excluded from patentability and concurs with the appellant that the invention as claimed does not relate to purely abstract subject-matter in the meaning of Articles 52(2) and (3) EPC, but does have a technical character. [read post]
18 Aug 2020, 1:23 pm
Related Musings:Starting July 1, 2020 General Contractors are…Some Good News Coming July 1, 2020 for Construction…A Few More 2020 Bills "Crossing Over" in the General…Impactful Construction Legislation Enacted for 2020Construction Legislation Likely to Take Effect July 1, 2020 [read post]
27 Nov 2019, 2:36 pm
Chapter 13 DOES stop the collection of past-due support. [read post]
26 Aug 2013, 8:00 am
Accordingly, the Court deferred to the SEC’s interpretation that the regulation does not have a scienter requirement because the 1934 Act does not contain words indicating an intent to impose such a requirement. [read post]
11 Mar 2021, 8:14 am
The post Confidentiality Clause Does Not Shield Employee from Answering Questions About Employer in Securities Investigation, Court Rules appeared first on Peter A. [read post]
11 Mar 2021, 8:14 am
The post Confidentiality Clause Does Not Shield Employee from Answering Questions About Employer in Securities Investigation, Court Rules appeared first on Peter A. [read post]
22 Jun 2012, 1:57 pm
The Rules governing procedure in the Division of Workers’ Compensation are listed at N.J.A.C.12:235 - 1:1 through 13:6. [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 4:00 am
The post Does Fair Use Provide a Celebrity Right to Plagiarize? [read post]
26 Sep 2019, 4:32 am
The increases will be phased in on the following dates: October 1, 2019—$11 September 1, 2020—$12 August 1, 2021—$13 July 1, 2022—$14 June 1, 2023—$15 After the $15 level is reached, the state’s minimum wage will be adjusted based on the employment cost index, a federal figure that measures the cost of labor in certain businesses. [read post]
22 Dec 2016, 6:53 am
Toshiba Corporation et al, 1-13-cv-00453 (DED December 19, 2016, Order) (Robinson, USDJ) [read post]
13 Jun 2014, 9:05 am
comes the breaking news that the Court of Appeal of Hamm just upheld the Bielefeld District Court decision (Urt. v. 15.05.2014, Az. 22 U 60/13). [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 6:02 am
On 3 March 2015, Advocate General Szpunar delivered its opinion in the case C-681/13 (Diago Brands BV) concerning the interpretation of Art. 34 para. 1 of Regulation (EC) No. 44/2001 (former Regulation (EU) No. 1215/2012), in a case where recognition of a judgment of one Member State is sought in another Member State. [read post]
