Search for: "Does 1 - 37"
Results 321 - 340
of 5,337
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jun 2019, 8:24 pm
Alberta (aff’d ABCA; leave to appeal to SCC refused) as justified under s. 1 [56] The objective of the age requirement is similarly clear if one considers that, in the absence of an age requirement, babies meeting the citizenship and residency requirements would be eligible to vote. [read post]
18 Apr 2017, 8:44 pm
Does your client have a right to view the evidence against him/her? [read post]
11 Aug 2014, 3:42 am
Even the UNCITRAL Model Law on ICA does not apply Section 27 to foreign arbitrations. [read post]
2 Apr 2018, 1:07 pm
But, for each $100 of stock options granted, (2) is $21 worse than (1) for the employer (all else equal), albeit $37 better for the employee.Not to worry, however - both are better off under (2) than they would have been under (1) so long as the option grant is between $21 and $37 smaller (per $100 of options that would otherwise have been granted) under (2) than it would have been had they chosen (1).Obviously further legal analysis is required before… [read post]
1 Oct 2015, 3:15 pm
§ 316(d) and 37 C.F.R. [read post]
20 Dec 2008, 3:44 pm
§ § 348(a), 349(b)(1)(C), 506, 1307(a). [read post]
27 Dec 2016, 7:32 am
Originally posted 2012-04-09 17:37:17. [read post]
21 Jan 2014, 7:43 pm
Fact is, while the Colorado law says you can smoke marijuana, it does not say you can have as much as you want. [read post]
16 Oct 2016, 12:36 pm
It was not until June 17, 2014 (almost 37 years later) that this patent was granted (source).link: http://www.collective-evolution.com/2016/10/17/a-patent-for-the-controversial-impossible-quantum-space-engine-em-drive-was-just-made-public/ [read post]
11 Oct 2019, 9:31 am
He received a 37-month sentence (rather than a range of 1 – 7 without enhancements). [read post]
2 Apr 2019, 9:42 am
Does the proposed text in SCCR/37/8 deal with the “internet”? [read post]
7 Apr 2017, 1:00 am
According to the latest Annual Report by the Boards of Appeal, the average length of inter partes proceedings is 37 months (up 1 month from 2015), i.e. more than three years. [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 10:51 am
See 37 C.F.R. [read post]
3 Jul 2013, 5:03 am
Lippa 2013 ONSC 4424[1] Does a judicial officer exceed his or her jurisdiction in directing where legal professionals will sit in the courtroom, and the order in which cases will be called? [read post]
6 Mar 2017, 3:43 am
Here’s the results from a recent survey on management representation letters: 1. [read post]
6 Mar 2017, 3:43 am
Here’s the results from a recent survey on management representation letters: 1. [read post]
24 Mar 2014, 10:01 pm
Evans has more time than most to work the bill as the California General Assembly does not adjourn until Nov. 30. [read post]
30 Aug 2012, 6:44 pm
So whether you have concerns about these technologies or whether you are totally comfortable with them and happy to have them, you should support Prop. 37, because all it does it require transparency. [read post]
18 Apr 2013, 5:01 pm
Moreover, claim 1 does not contain any additional feature related to any implementation in a therapeutic method.The particular approach to novelty created by decision G 6/83, therefore, does not apply to claim 1 of the main request, the subject-matter of which is equivalent to a process claim, i.e. [read post]
24 Jan 2013, 5:01 pm
Inventive step[5] The decision under appeal starts from D1 and makes reference to passages on pages 1, 4 and 9. [5.1] On page 1, D1 introduces the problem of protecting ownership of digital data on the Internet. [read post]
