Search for: "Does 1-43" Results 321 - 340 of 4,441
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jul 2017, 6:55 am
’ [South Dakota Codified Laws] 43–43B–1(2).This particular variation of the offense violates both property and privacy rights of the victim. [read post]
25 Apr 2022, 4:29 am by Rebecca Tushnet
(Also, using §43(a)(1)(A) as a cut-rate false advertising claim does pose some First Amendment problems, but the court doesn’t say anything about that!) [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 3:50 am
 One thing that does strike this Kat is that in the first of this series of cases, EP 1 210 115, directed towards a dosage regime of trastuzumab, was held to be invalid on the basis that the skilled person would attempt a trial of the claimed regime; there was no need for a fair expectation of a positive outcome of the trial - only sufficient expectation to actually conduct it. [read post]
21 Sep 2022, 12:14 pm by Giorgio Luceri
The EU trade mark was registered in 2011.In 2018, Asia Standard filed an application for revocation of the above EU trade mark on the basis of Article 58(1)(a) EUTMR, claiming that the mark had not been put to genuine use. [read post]
23 Apr 2009, 10:00 am
Consequently, the differing wording in Art. 43 Brussels Regulation does not result in a substantive change which leads to the result that the Court’s interpretation of the Convention in this respect - according to which Art. 36 of the Convention excludes procedures whereby interested third parties may challenge an enforcement order under domestic law (see para. 27 and C-148/84 (para. 17)) - can be transferred to the Regulation (paras. 24, 30). [read post]
The Act provides that the new QM loan is deemed to comply with the ATR requirements if the loan: (1) is originated by and retained by the institution, (2) complies with requirements regarding prepayment penalties and points and fees, and (3) does not have negative amortization or interest-only terms. [read post]
8 Oct 2023, 6:12 am by Daniel Shaviro
The UK currently does this through a digital services tax, but Pillar 1 is designed to replace this. [read post]
26 Jan 2021, 1:54 pm
  “To establish a § 1 violation, a plaintiff must prove that: (1) the defendants engaged in a conspiracy; (2) that restrained trade; (3) in the relevant market. [read post]
25 Apr 2013, 4:47 pm by Lindsey Tonsager
The revised COPPA Rule takes effect on July 1, 2013. [read post]
27 Nov 2019, 5:45 am by Kevin Kaufman
State 2017 Rank 2018 Rank 2019 Rank 2020 Rank Change from 2019 to 2020 Alabama 49 49 50 50 0 Alaska 5 5 5 5 0 Arizona 44 44 40 40 0 Arkansas 46 46 45 46 -1 California 41 40 46 45 1 Colorado 37 37 37 37 0 Connecticut 31 30 30 26 4 Delaware 1 1 2 2 0 Florida 29 31 22 23 -1 Georgia 34 29 29 29 0 Hawaii 26 26 33 30 3 Idaho 15 16 12 12 0 Illinois 27 27 35 33 2 Indiana 9 9 13 20 -7 Iowa 20 20 17 15 2 Kansas 28 28 27 38 -11 Kentucky 13 15 18 14 4 Louisiana 50 50… [read post]
8 Feb 2007, 5:24 am
UPDATE What does Rissie Owens have to hide? [read post]