Search for: "Does 1-54"
Results 321 - 340
of 3,380
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Nov 2019, 10:00 am
City,383 U.S. 1, 36 (1966). [read post]
2 Feb 2017, 2:14 am
No more from divsionalsOn 29 November 2016, the Enlarged Board of Appeal at the EPO had issued its order in case G 1/15, but not yet its decision. [read post]
3 Apr 2013, 7:01 am
system=BPAI&flNm=fd2010001801-12-15-2010-1. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 8:39 am
The GAO’s bid protest decision in Ashland Sales & Services Company, B-408969 (Nov. 1, 2013) involved a DLA small business set-aside procurement for Air Force lightweight jackets. [read post]
11 Apr 2013, 5:01 pm
” [8.5] In order to assess what is the subject-matter claimed in claim 1 of the main request, the claim’s construction has first to be investigated. [8.5.1] In accordance with Article 7(1), second sentence, of the Revision Act of 29 November 2000 and the decision of the Administrative Council of 28 June 2001 (Special edition No. 1, OJ EPO 2007, 197), revised A 54(4) is applicable, since the mention of the grant of the patent in suit was published in… [read post]
25 Mar 2020, 7:02 am
An error is non-substantial if it does not change, in whole or in part, the holding of the case. [read post]
10 Sep 2018, 1:45 am
Claim 1, Novelty[...]5. [read post]
9 Jun 2023, 8:01 am
The Protocol I provision requires states to criminalize the listed acts domestically, including with the present-in form of universal jurisdiction (Article 85(1) AP I, as informed, e.g., by Article 146 Geneva Convention IV), but does not directly underpin the jurisdiction of any supranational court or tribunal. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 9:37 am
§ 254b(j)(1), which establishes grants to health centers with large non-English-speaking constituencies for “interpretation” and “translation” services. [read post]
18 Mar 2021, 11:28 am
Instead, SB 54 mandates that policyholders carry bodily injury (BI) coverage. [read post]
7 May 2023, 6:51 pm
— 63 % say Biden does not have the mental sharpness to serve effectively as president, up from 43 % in 2020 and 54 % a year ago. [read post]
1 Nov 2009, 4:43 pm
When the Enlarged Board decided, in G 1/03, that disclaimers did not violate A 123(2), many practitioners were greatly relieved. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 2:20 pm
(D.I. 54 at 4). [read post]
4 Jan 2022, 6:02 am
At the end, I aggregate them, weighing each 1/3 like USNWR does, to give an overall percentile total. [read post]
29 Apr 2015, 7:19 am
The final rule will be published by August 1, 2015, and generally will apply to discharges occurring on or after October 1, 2015. [read post]
11 Jun 2013, 7:05 pm
The appellant lost in Ex parte WeinerKSR is mentioned:“The combination of familiar elements according to known methodsis likely to be obvious when it does no more than yield predictable results. [read post]
2 Feb 2015, 7:45 am
1. [read post]
9 Jan 2018, 7:11 am
The 3rd Circuit’s suggestion that Elsa should have obtained a Rule 54(b) certification was misplaced, because that rule does not apply when one action (11-54) is resolved in its entirety. [read post]
22 Nov 2019, 1:01 am
The board does not share the views of the Examining division, and concludes that the claim has sufficient technical elements that improve the security of the hardcopy certificate. [read post]
11 Sep 2007, 2:38 am
" Civil L.R. 54-3(c)(1). [read post]
