Search for: "Does 1-59" Results 321 - 340 of 3,006
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jun 2020, 7:00 am by Jacob Sapochnick
  It does not apply to persons aboard a flight scheduled to arrive in the United States that departed prior to 11:59 p.m. eastern daylight time on May 26, 2020. [read post]
19 Nov 2009, 7:29 am by Mack Sperling
What exactly does that mean if you are going to be dealing with a response to a filing made (or a deadline that starts running) before December 1, with a response or filing due after December 1? [read post]
4 Jan 2022, 6:02 am by Derek T. Muller
At the end, I aggregate them, weighing each 1/3 like USNWR does, to give an overall percentile total. [read post]
12 Jun 2017, 11:49 pm by Sander van Rijnswou
In view of this new citation, it appears to be appropriate to remit the case to the department of first instance (Article 111(1) EPC 1973, see also Case Law of the Boards of Appeal, 8th edition, IV.E.7.2.2).OrderFor these reasons it is decided that:1. [read post]
20 Nov 2018, 7:15 am by Howard M. Wasserman
A potentially appealable interlocutory order is considered a “judgment” for Rule 59(e) purposes. [read post]
12 Aug 2023, 11:45 am by Unknown
"Modelling social inclusion, self-esteem, loneliness, psychological distress, and psychological resilience of refugees: Does hospitableness matter? [read post]
23 Aug 2015, 3:49 pm
Brawner, 327 S.W. 2d 808, 812 (Mo. banc 1959). [59]   In Canada Trust Co. v. [read post]
Among respondents aged 18-34, a combined 59 percent selected “1” and “2,” whereas only a combined 26 percent selected “4” and “5. [read post]
24 Apr 2015, 1:46 pm by Jessica Nyman
The FCC’s decision, however, does not affect Class A TV stations, which are still required to complete the digital transition by the September 1 deadline. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 5:10 pm by Jon L. Gelman
NJ is one of the few state that does not follow the AMA Guidelines in determining disability. [read post]
22 Feb 2018, 8:31 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Patent 6,286,045 (“’045 patent”) and claims 1–3, 5–7,9, 11–20, 22, 24–31, 34–39, 41–47, and 49 of U.S. [read post]
24 Mar 2014, 9:00 am
Strict liability, which is also applicable in most product liability actions, means the injured party does not need to prove the defendant fault. [read post]