Search for: "Does 1-61"
Results 321 - 340
of 2,802
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jun 2008, 10:54 pm
A competing state initiative, Proposition 98, was rejected by 61% of California voters. [read post]
26 May 2007, 6:57 pm
That does not seem related, except the Great Swamp might be a good place to put 18-year-old pickpockets. [read post]
11 Sep 2008, 10:27 am
Most often, the lender does not know that a tenant is living in the building and the tenant does not know that the landlord is losing the building to the bank.This is, to say the least, a very stressful and disconcerting situation for effected tenants.Enter the Lawyers Committee For Better Housing, in Chicago. [read post]
18 Feb 2021, 1:19 am
FactsIn June 2011, Ascendis Animal Health (Pty) Limited (the applicant) initiated revocation proceedings against Merck Sharp Dohme Corporation and Merial Limited (the respondents) for the annulment and repeal of the Patent 1998/10975 (the patent) in terms of section 61(1) of the Patents Act 57 of 1978 (the Act) because the invention was not patentable under section 25 of the Act as the invention was not new and it lacked an inventive step. [read post]
18 Feb 2021, 1:19 am
FactsIn June 2011, Ascendis Animal Health (Pty) Limited (the applicant) initiated revocation proceedings against Merck Sharp Dohme Corporation and Merial Limited (the respondents) for the annulment and repeal of the Patent 1998/10975 (the patent) in terms of section 61(1) of the Patents Act 57 of 1978 (the Act) because the invention was not patentable under section 25 of the Act as the invention was not new and it lacked an inventive step. [read post]
18 Feb 2021, 1:19 am
FactsIn June 2011, Ascendis Animal Health (Pty) Limited (the applicant) initiated revocation proceedings against Merck Sharp Dohme Corporation and Merial Limited (the respondents) for the annulment and repeal of the Patent 1998/10975 (the patent) in terms of section 61(1) of the Patents Act 57 of 1978 (the Act) because the invention was not patentable under section 25 of the Act as the invention was not new and it lacked an inventive step. [read post]
18 Feb 2021, 1:19 am
FactsIn June 2011, Ascendis Animal Health (Pty) Limited (the applicant) initiated revocation proceedings against Merck Sharp Dohme Corporation and Merial Limited (the respondents) for the annulment and repeal of the Patent 1998/10975 (the patent) in terms of section 61(1) of the Patents Act 57 of 1978 (the Act) because the invention was not patentable under section 25 of the Act as the invention was not new and it lacked an inventive step. [read post]
2 May 2007, 9:02 am
The next question is why management does so well. [read post]
27 Sep 2009, 8:08 am
Jasorka, 153 F.3d 58, 60-61 (2d Cir. 1998). [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 3:51 am
Inc., 61 AD3d 418 ( lst Dept 2009). [read post]
26 Aug 2009, 10:30 pm
They responded: Industry Canada does not alter submissions. [read post]
12 Aug 2013, 2:00 am
Super. 61, 72-73 (App. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 12:19 pm
(The BEYAZ approval letter does not include a time stamp.) [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 2:42 pm
Doe, S171382. [read post]
10 Feb 2016, 12:07 pm
Thus, we conclude thatthe district court did not err in granting summary judgmentthat Compaq’s F10 BIOS does not meet the “commands”limitation in claims 1, 3, and 5. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 8:00 am
APC is waived if author does not have access to publishing grant; if author does have access, the APC is US$2000. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 3:16 am
- How does the matchmaking work between institutional buyers and companies raising capital with ATMs? [read post]
29 Dec 2022, 1:49 pm
LEXIS 1593, 1992 WL 16749, *1 (9th Cir. [read post]
4 Feb 2009, 11:23 pm
The poll of more than 3,000 people reported the following results: 1. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 5:37 am
Amos was a 61 year old man who was working for Dry Crouch as a custodian while he was seeing her as a patient. [read post]
