Search for: "Doll v. Doll"
Results 321 - 340
of 678
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Dec 2010, 11:56 am
Bush v. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 7:03 am
He cites Olsen v. [read post]
22 Aug 2008, 1:58 pm
MGA Entertainment plastic doll smack-down, with Mattel claiming the defendant stole its intellectual property to develop and sell the Bratz doll. [read post]
16 May 2007, 8:33 am
If you’re going to read one opinion today, the Law Blog beseeches you to check out Funny Cide Ventures v. [read post]
5 Oct 2010, 4:39 am
In Moody v. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 1:05 pm
In the Franklin Mint v. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 6:47 am
Heller and McDonald v. [read post]
10 May 2017, 8:05 am
Bobbleheads.com, LLC v. [read post]
15 Jul 2015, 8:36 am
v=RaBmWqQkKYE while Lancelot is a creature of Queen Morgana https://www.youtube.com/watch? [read post]
27 Aug 2008, 2:33 pm
Quinn argued that Larian, too, personally gained nearly $800 million in stock value and distributions flowing from the success of the dolls. ... [read post]
2 Dec 2016, 8:20 am
Kenyon v. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 11:58 am
The current issue (1/5/11) of Loeb & Loeb's IP/Entertainment Law Weekly Case Update reports on (and links to) three recent decisions by federal District Courts in California: Clements v. [read post]
6 Dec 2013, 11:50 am
Seuss Enterprises, LP v. [read post]
9 Sep 2014, 8:13 am
See, e.g., Theer v. [read post]
4 Oct 2009, 9:21 pm
It did however mention American Needle v. [read post]
16 Apr 2014, 12:18 pm
See Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. [read post]
31 Jan 2013, 9:11 am
[Post by Venkat Balasubramani] People v. [read post]
21 Mar 2018, 4:00 am
All of the gift bags contained female blow-up dolls except for the gift bag that Player A received, which contained a male blow-up doll. [read post]
21 Mar 2018, 4:00 am
All of the gift bags contained female blow-up dolls except for the gift bag that Player A received, which contained a male blow-up doll. [read post]
22 Dec 2017, 2:29 pm
Dist. v. [read post]
