Search for: "Duncan v State"
Results 321 - 340
of 761
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Dec 2014, 9:54 am
And a federal court has recently agreed, because on April 10, 2014, the United States District Court for the Southern District of California ruled that A’lor is barred from infringing CHARRIOL cable trademarks by selling ALOR jewelry that uses such cable. [read post]
20 Nov 2014, 1:27 pm
Prosecutors are calling upon a state law put in place by voters in 2000 that has not been used until now. [read post]
20 Nov 2014, 1:27 pm
Prosecutors are calling upon a state law put in place by voters in 2000 that has not been used until now. [read post]
4 Nov 2014, 3:49 pm
United States. [read post]
18 Oct 2014, 7:59 am
In later installments, I have discussed the seminal decision of TK & SK ex rel LK v. [read post]
10 Oct 2014, 4:00 am
As the Court of Appeals said in Duncan v Kelly, 9 N.Y.3d 102, a probationary employee may be discharged for "almost any reason, or for no reason at all" as long as the decision is not made "in bad faith or for an improper or impermissible reason. [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 9:01 pm
For example, dissenting in the 2010 case of United States v. [read post]
25 Sep 2014, 7:04 am
For some time now -- ever since ECUSA's unilateral decision to consecrate V. [read post]
19 Sep 2014, 2:28 pm
Taken together, Duncan and Baldwin did not change the public policies of the separate states. [read post]
New Hampshire Supreme Court Reinstates Tuition Tax Credit Program But Avoids Law’s Constitutionality
2 Sep 2014, 6:57 am
The state supreme court dismissed Duncan v. [read post]
29 Aug 2014, 4:00 am
In Duncan v. [read post]
13 Aug 2014, 4:34 pm
Rumsfeld, 548 U.S. 557, 602 (2006) (plurality op.); Duncan v. [read post]
31 Jul 2014, 1:00 pm
Tristan Duncan also noted that, when a class action is litigated in state court, there may be a viable argument that the state court’s interpretation of state law violates due process (e.g., because a very vague “unfairness” standard is being applied) or constitutes a judicial taking. [read post]
23 Jul 2014, 9:42 am
The Fourth District described the effect of the Florida Supreme Court’s decision in State v. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 11:55 am
June. 13, 2013), holding essentially that, since those meanies on the United States Supreme Court aren’t letting plaintiffs sue generic manufacturers, we’ll change Alabama common law and let them sue someone else. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 7:18 am
However, the decision applies only to a category of ostensibly public workers who aren’t “full-fledged” state employees, and to which the High Court’s 1977 holding in Abood v. [read post]
13 Jun 2014, 6:47 am
Maryland – Hershey v. [read post]
11 Jun 2014, 4:00 am
The Appellate Division concurred with the Supreme Court’s ruling noting that “The giving of false statements in the course of an official investigation has been upheld as a ground for dismissal from municipal employment," citing Duncan v Kelly, 43 AD3d 297, affirmed 9 NY3d 1024.As the United States Supreme Court held in Bryson v. [read post]
29 May 2014, 4:00 am
Maintaining Sight of the Client This book analyzes the state of the law of privilege in Canada. [read post]
4 May 2014, 8:07 am
Using Judge Posner's reasoning in Hoctor v. [read post]
