Search for: "Duty v. Walker" Results 321 - 340 of 544
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jun 2012, 3:35 am by Daniel West
question’, Lord Walker identified the provisions of s 14 of the Act as being key. [read post]
21 Apr 2012, 5:06 pm by INFORRM
The main opinion, by Chief Justice Roberts, held that a loose understanding of ministerial and religious duties was appropriate – the employee who had been fired was a teacher who spent most of her time on non-religious duties. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 9:46 am by Daniel West, Olswang LLP
It is however an established principle of Strasbourg jurisprudence that such a right does not extend so far as to impose a positive obligation on public authorities to disclose or distribute information (see Leander v Sweden (1987) 9 EHRR 433 or Roche v United Kingdom (2005) 42 EHRR 599). [read post]
14 Mar 2012, 6:11 am by Michael Scutt
An employer has a duty toact only where the indications are plain enough that he should do something about it. [read post]
Lord Roger, with whom Lord Walker and Lord Collins agreed, was also content to ground his understanding of persecution in a right that does expressly exist within international human rights law. [read post]
1 Mar 2012, 2:20 pm by Lyle Denniston
Walker, had no legal duty to take himself out of trying the case. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 3:01 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
LLC v Paul, Hastings, Janofsky & Walker, LLP ; 2012 NY Slip Op 50285(U) ; Decided on February 16, 2012 ; Supreme Court, New York County ; Fried, J. we see the results of "systematic" deleting of electronic data. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 4:40 am by Rob Robinson
 bit.ly/yRWkxa (Henry Kelston) How to Create an eDiscovery Team – An Interview with HB Gordan from Teva Pharmaceuticals – bit.ly/xCM6yj (Amber Scorah) How to Reduce Medical Malpractice eDiscovery Issues and Costs - bit.ly/ylZmA5 (Matthew Keris) Innovation and Informed Risk-Taking are an eDiscovery Duty - bit.ly/zKtiDm (Chris Dale) Lester v. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 8:09 am by Wessen Jazrawi
Sanade, Harrison & Walker v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] UKUT 00048(IAC) – Read judgment. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 3:27 am by Adam Wagner
Lord Dyson gives the leading judgment, with which Lord Walker, Lady Hale, Lord Brown and Lord Mance agree. [read post]