Search for: "ELI LILLY & CO." Results 321 - 340 of 1,007
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Nov 2015, 11:34 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Del.Some background on the Cubist case:Daptomycin was developed by Eli Lilly & Co. [read post]
16 Mar 2007, 9:52 am
Their suit argued that National City failed to move money from Eli Lilly and Co. stock quickly enough. [read post]
14 Nov 2023, 9:10 am by Seeger Weiss
Seeger Weiss attorneys Chris Seeger, David Buchanan and Steven Daroci filed a lawsuit on behalf of Arlington County, Virginia against insulin manufacturers Eli Lilly, Novo Nordisk, and Sanofi, and pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) CVS Caremark, Express Scripts and OptumRx, for their alleged role in a scheme to aggressively inflate the price of insulin and other diabetes medications. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 6:43 am
  On the same day, no less, the IPKat learns of the consultation on the 15th draft of the Rules of Procedure of the UPC, and of Mr Justice Arnold’s exciting decision in Eli Lilly & Company v Janssen Alzheimer Immunotherapy (let’s call them Lilly and JAI). [read post]
27 Nov 2012, 8:43 am
And now, here is a legal first, straight from the pen (well, keyboard) of our Mr Justice Arnold in joined cases Actavis Group hf v Eli Lilly & Company (USA)/Medis ehf v Eli Lilly & Company (USA) [2012] EWHC 3316 (Pat) on whether the English Courts have jurisdiction over issues of infringement of foreign-designated patents. [read post]
23 Oct 2014, 2:23 pm
Indianapolis, Indiana - An Indiana patent attorney for Eli Lilly and Company of Indianapolis, Indiana ("Lilly") and The Trustees of Princeton University of Princeton, New Jersey ("Princeton") filed a patent infringement complaint in the Southern District of Indiana alleging that Nang Kuang Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. of Tainan City, Taiwan and CANDA NK-2, LLC of Waco, Texas infringed and/or will infringe ALIMTA®, U.S. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 10:28 am
Indianapolis, Indiana - An Indiana patent attorney for Eli Lilly and Company of Indianapolis, Indiana; Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd of Tokyo, Japan; Daiichi Sankyo, Inc. of Parsippany, New Jersey; and Ube Industries, Ltd. of Yamaguchi, Japan sued in the Southern District of Indiana alleging that Panacea Biotec, Ltd. of New Delhi, India ("Panacea") infringed Effient® products, Patent Nos. 8,404,703 and 8,569,325, which have been issued by the United States Patent… [read post]
4 Jun 2020, 2:58 am by Dennis Crouch
Eli Lilly and Company, No. 19-1058; Dr. [read post]
14 Jul 2014, 11:28 am
Indianapolis, Indiana - An Indiana patent attorney for Eli Lilly and Company of Indianapolis, Indiana; Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd of Tokyo, Japan; Daiichi Sankyo, Inc. of Parsippany, New Jersey; and Ube Industries, Ltd. of Yamaguchi, Japan sued in the Southern District of Indiana alleging that HEC Pharm Co., Ltd. of China and HEC Pharm USA Inc. of Princeton, New Jersey (collectively, "HEC Pharm") infringed Lilly's patented Effient®… [read post]
26 Aug 2011, 7:28 am by Bexis
Eli Lilly & Co., ___ F.3d ___, 2011 WL 3625105, slip op. (2d Cir. [read post]
7 Jun 2019, 10:22 am by Dennis Crouch
by Dennis Crouch Eli Lilly and Company v. [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 11:33 am
Ariad sued Eli Lilly over 6,410,516. [read post]
18 Mar 2015, 7:00 am
Feb. 26, 2015), defendant Eli Lilly & Co. moved for summary judgment in a Byetta pancreatitis case, arguing that, under the “learned intermediary” doctrine, it was entitled to summary judgment on plaintiff’s claims that Byetta’s pancreatitis warnings were inadequate.Plaintiff cross-moved for summary adjudication, arguing that manufacturer’s duty to warn ran to the plaintiff because, pursuant to 21 C.F.R. [read post]