Search for: "Empire v. Commercial"
Results 321 - 340
of 752
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jul 2016, 4:13 pm
Teaching academic, author of acclaimed defamation law textbooks, leading media law barrister in Australia and the UK, Dr Matt Collins QC packs a lot into his day … He agreed to spare some of his time to discuss defamation, privacy, celebrity, journalists’ sources, and free speech, just for starters GLJ: I wanted to start by asking you what you see as the major flaws in Australian defamation law, and how you might go about correcting them. [read post]
9 Jun 2016, 7:38 am
Can we think of case studies that offer compelling demonstrations of these costs, or empirical work that might help? [read post]
1 Jun 2016, 5:12 am
See McCain v. [read post]
20 May 2016, 12:25 pm
If we took the empirical evidence seriously, courts arguably should (1) approve more outright bans on commercial speech, and (2) strike down more of these compromise disclosures, with the probable result of decreasing the total amount of commercial speech regulation. [read post]
11 May 2016, 1:04 am
Never too late 91 [week ending on Sunday 10 April] - The Future of second-medical-use patents, Fordham 2016|AG Opinion in United Video Properties, Inc v Telenet NV, C-57/15|Batman v Superman in commercial context| Trade Secrets and the Bio-Pharmaceutical industry| Panorama and the three step test in the Swedish Supreme Court| Public consultation on the Enforcement Directive| Hyperlinks in GS Media, C-160/15 | Life as an IP… [read post]
3 May 2016, 4:43 am
Jaslow and Lotus v. [read post]
2 May 2016, 9:20 pm
When they created the DMCA, nobody conceived that a company like Google’s empire would become the most powerful asset in the world. [read post]
2 May 2016, 2:30 pm
JC: give us more of flavor of how much of your takedown effort is automated v. human and what interaction is? [read post]
13 Apr 2016, 7:59 am
Pope Boniface VIII excommunicated the whole city of Florence, a measure which had heavy commercial consequences on that city. [read post]
23 Mar 2016, 2:35 pm
Rev. 1 (2012) 4 86 Chien, Colleen V. [read post]
20 Mar 2016, 11:52 am
Patent No. 317,676 claim 3 (filed Jan. 9, 1880). ] Later, the Supreme Court would recognize that the paper claim was likely valid. n47 However, that claim would have been commercially worthless - few, if any, comm [read post]
11 Mar 2016, 11:42 am
Circularity: if you allow that, won’t market power increase/the empirical world may change. [read post]
11 Mar 2016, 7:55 am
No: empirically. [read post]
2 Mar 2016, 5:11 am
The Ninth Circuit uses the extrinsic/intrinsic test created in the Sid & Marty Krofft Television Productions, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Feb 2016, 12:04 pm
Not clear that this empirical claim is true. [read post]
24 Feb 2016, 9:03 am
On occasion, a few tariffs have slipped through essentially, if not completely, unopposed because they were insufficiently commercially important to warrant even minimal opposition. [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 5:33 pm
Also included duty to account; emergence of author as commercial dealer. [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 11:57 am
Titanic v. [read post]
16 Feb 2016, 6:00 am
One example is the conviction he secured in the case of People v. [read post]
