Search for: "English v. English"
Results 321 - 340
of 11,152
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Aug 2019, 4:31 am
Jane Lambert Patents Court (Mr Justice Atnold) Allergan, Inc and another v Aspire Pharma Ltd [2019] EWHC 1085 (Pat) (3 May 2019) Allergan Inc is the proprietor of European patent EP1753434 for an enhanced bimatoprost ophthalmic solution which its English subsidiary, Allergan Ltd. exploits by marketing a product containing 0.1 mg/ml (0.01%) bimatoprost for ophthalmic [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 7:48 pm
Bennett and McComish v. [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 2:34 pm
First up was Holt v. [read post]
24 Apr 2019, 3:28 am
On 10 April 2019, the UK Supreme Court passed its long awaited decision in Vedanta v Lungowe confirming that Zambian citizens, who have suffered from the environmental pollution caused by mining operations in Zambia, can pursue in England claims against Vedanta Resources Plc, an English-domiciled parent company, and Konokola Copper Mines plc, its foreign subsidiary and the owner of the mine (“Vedanta” and “KCM”). [read post]
12 Apr 2008, 9:44 am
The significant point of the judgement is not the result of English assets being remitted... [read post]
31 Dec 2009, 12:09 pm
A group not involved in Lyon v. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 7:55 am
Furthermore, Google Spain had no bearing on how English law should approach a contention that a given defendant was liable for breach of Article 8. [read post]
5 Nov 2013, 3:08 am
That is the question before the Court this morning in Bond v. [read post]
21 Apr 2014, 3:59 pm
Aereo, Inc., in Plain English. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 1:43 pm
In a case decided by the New Jersey Supreme Court called State v. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 12:37 pm
Last week in King v. [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 6:29 am
Attorneys on the case, Ling v. [read post]
27 Jun 2010, 5:00 pm
In my inbox are all kinds of questions from Plain English readers – how could the Court do this? [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 5:38 am
At issue in Kasten v. [read post]
29 Apr 2011, 5:24 pm
in Virginia v. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 6:55 am
Many Plain English readers will be interested in the case of Skinner v. [read post]
3 Apr 2023, 3:37 pm
The claimants were two software houses, one English and the other American, which were at [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 1:34 am
In Faraday Reinsurance Co Ltd v Howden North America Inc & Anor [2012] EWCA Civ 980, the Court of Appeal ruled that the judge at first instance, Judge Beatson, was entitled to conclude that English proceedings would serve a useful purpose when he refused to set aside a service out of the jurisdiction of negative declaratory proceedings by Faraday against Howden.In the Commercial Court decision, Beatson J refused to set aside the service because he found that the policy in… [read post]
12 Jul 2019, 9:00 am
The first is that probably the four highest profile design cases in the UK in recent years (Procter & Gamble Co v Reckitt Benckiser (UK) Ltd [2007] EWCA Civ 936, Dyson v Vax [2011] EWCA Civ 1206, Samsung Electronics (UK) Ltd v Apple Inc [2012] EWCA Civ 1339, and PMS International Limited v Magmatic Limited [2016] UKSC 12 (i.e. [read post]
28 Jul 2008, 10:16 am
The judge therefore decided against granting a stay.Equitas v Allstate is yet another demonstration of the English courts' desire to hold parties to their agreements regarding jurisdiction. [read post]
