Search for: "Ex parte CHRISTOPHER" Results 321 - 340 of 442
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Oct 2007, 10:53 am
Thus, we affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand this cause to the trial court with instructions that it enter final judgment for the Town and Police Commission as to Guzik's request for the return of his personal property.In State of Indiana v. [read post]
2 Feb 2020, 4:41 pm by INFORRM
The Chinese firm will be banned from supplying kit to “sensitive parts” of the network, it will only be allowed to account for 35% of the kit in a network’s periphery and it will be excluded from areas near military bases and nuclear sites. [read post]
10 Feb 2013, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
The ex-wife of former MP Chris Huhne denies perverting the course of justice and is pleading a special defence of marital coercion. [read post]
8 Nov 2009, 7:44 pm
LLC v Garmin Int'l, Inc (Chicago Intellectual Property Law Blog) District Court E D Texas: Motion for summary judgment as to patent defendant's defences and counterclaims granted in part; antitrust claims severed: Fiber Systems International v Applied Optical Systems (EDTexweblog.com) District Court E D Texas: Motion to compel denied - non-compliance with 'meet and confer' rule: Konami Digital Entertainment Co v Harmonix Music (EDTexweblog.com) BPAI used dictionary and p [read post]
4 Mar 2022, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Jay Goldstone testified at his deposition he reached out to lobbyist Christopher Wahl days ahead of a city council meeting. [read post]
9 Jul 2020, 6:58 am by Jack Goldsmith, Nathaniel Sobel
The next day, the Wall Street Journal wrote that Barr—who was “heavily involved” in the review—had enlisted CIA Director Gina Haspel, Director of National Intelligence Dan Coats and FBI Director Christopher Wray in the Durham investigation. [read post]
2 Apr 2021, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Gaetz Investigation Complicated by Overture to His Father About Ex-FBI Agent Who Went Missing MSN – Matt Zapotosky and Devlin Barrett (Washington Post) | Published: 3/31/2021 The Justice Department is investigating U.S. [read post]
1 May 2016, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
On 27 April 2016, HHJ Moloney QC heard an application in the case of ZAM v TFW & ors  and gave an ex tempore judgment. [read post]
3 Nov 2023, 3:01 pm by Daniel J. Gilman
And outside participants included still-familiar names, like Christopher Yoo, Tim Wu, and Gigi Sohn. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 3:18 pm by Benjamin Wittes
For example, the district court found that Salahi sent a fax to al-Qaida operative Christopher Paul in January 1997, asking for his help in finding “a true Group and Place” for “some Brothers” interested in fighting jihad. [read post]
22 Mar 2021, 5:01 am by Jordan Brunner
The revision, which then-House Armed Services Committee Chairman Duncan Hunter introduced as part of the original House draft of the bill, enlarged the number of companies covered by the original version of Section 1237. [read post]
24 Jan 2021, 7:44 am
  I have been teaching the class on  "Actors, Institutions, and Legal Frameworks in International Affairs" off and on for a number of years since I helped develop the course  as part of the committee that was tasked with a role in the establishment of the School of International Affairs of Penn State University. [read post]
15 Jun 2023, 12:16 am by David Pocklington
Opposition On 17 June 2020, Christopher Cooper wrote personally to Gau Ch. seeking information on how he might become a party “to reverse the actions of removal of parts of windows &c? [read post]
The Court reverses and renders in part and affirms in part the court of appeals' judgment. [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 8:30 am by Eugene Volokh
Businesses whose employees are the targets of violent stalkers or jealous exes, or perhaps even the targets themselves, g., Rojas v. [read post]
25 Mar 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Alvarez says he was working as part of a contract to do community engagement, not lobbying, and therefore is not in violation of ethics law. [read post]
26 Jan 2014, 4:11 am by Veronika Gaertner
However, in the author’s opinion, the court should have scrutinized the facts of the case much more closely – especially as in the matter at hand, as stipulated by § 26 FamFG, the court had to ascertain the relevant facts ex officio. [read post]