Search for: "Exxon Mobil"
Results 321 - 340
of 1,086
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Apr 2016, 9:01 pm
”Meanwhile, Exxon has “unequivocally” rejected the allegations that it “suppressed climate change research,” given “Exxon Mobil’s nearly 40-year history of climate research that was conducted publicly in conjunction with the Department of Energy, academics and the UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. [read post]
13 Apr 2016, 2:00 am
Exxon Mobil Corporation, et al., issued an important decision interpreting the scope of the Texas Solid Waste Disposal Act (TSWDA) as it pertains to judicial review of and the burden of proof for certain administrative cleanup orders issued by the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ). [read post]
9 Apr 2016, 7:30 am
Schneiderman announced a $10.75 million settlement with Exxon Mobil Corporation and ExxonMobil Oil Corporation, individually and as successors-in-interest to Mobil Oil Corporation and Mobil Corporation, to reimburse the New York Environmental Protection and Spill Compensation Fund (Oil Spill Fund) for oil spill cleanup and petroleum contamination removal costs at eight locations across the state. [read post]
8 Apr 2016, 2:49 am
” He said he would investigate Exxon Mobil following several articles alleging the company hid research conducted by its own scientists linking fossil-fuel emissions to global warming. [read post]
5 Apr 2016, 10:00 am
Exxon Mobil Corp (2004) 124 CA4th 1315 that I wrote about in “The Pitfalls of Bad Discovery Habits” are examples of trial courts’ misunderstanding of what a court needs to find before they can impose evidence sanctions. [read post]
5 Apr 2016, 10:00 am
Exxon Mobil Corp (2004) 124 CA4th 1315 that I wrote about in “The Pitfalls of Bad Discovery Habits” are examples of trial courts’ misunderstanding of what a court needs to find before they can impose evidence sanctions. [read post]
5 Apr 2016, 10:00 am
Exxon Mobil Corp (2004) 124 CA4th 1315 that I wrote about in “The Pitfalls of Bad Discovery Habits” are examples of trial courts’ misunderstanding of what a court needs to find before they can impose evidence sanctions. [read post]
5 Apr 2016, 10:00 am
Exxon Mobil Corp (2004) 124 CA4th 1315 that I wrote about in “The Pitfalls of Bad Discovery Habits” are examples of trial courts’ misunderstanding of what a court needs to find before they can impose evidence sanctions. [read post]
31 Mar 2016, 10:59 am
US Virgin Islands, Mass. launch probes into Exxon, investigating whether Exxon Mobil deceived shareholders or the public about climate change effects, joining similar inquiries by New York and California into the oil giant. [read post]
15 Mar 2016, 10:00 am
Exxon Mobil Corp. (2004) 124 CA4th 1315 is an example of the court’s misunderstanding of the Discovery Act and reacting erroneously to a garbage discovery response. [read post]
15 Mar 2016, 10:00 am
Exxon Mobil Corp. (2004) 124 CA4th 1315 is an example of the court’s misunderstanding of the Discovery Act and reacting erroneously to a garbage discovery response. [read post]
15 Mar 2016, 10:00 am
Exxon Mobil Corp. (2004) 124 CA4th 1315 is an example of the court’s misunderstanding of the Discovery Act and reacting erroneously to a garbage discovery response. [read post]
15 Mar 2016, 10:00 am
Exxon Mobil Corp. (2004) 124 CA4th 1315 is an example of the court’s misunderstanding of the Discovery Act and reacting erroneously to a garbage discovery response. [read post]
13 Mar 2016, 5:58 pm
In Eugene, Oregon, a group of 21 elementary and high school students has taken matters into its own hands and is suing the federal government as well as trade groups representing energy companies such as British Petroleum and Exxon Mobil over theirThe post Kids Sue the Government and Oil Giants Over Climate Change appeared first on Legal Reader. [read post]
21 Feb 2016, 10:17 am
That same month the same attorney general’s office confirmed it sent Exxon Mobil a subpoena for climate change information. [read post]
5 Feb 2016, 10:04 am
Exxon Mobil Corporation et al – United States District Court – Eastern District of Louisiana – February 4th, 2016) involves an alleged toxic tort exposure by the Plaintiff (Konrick). [read post]
5 Feb 2016, 6:24 am
The total represents a quarter of all the money spent on federal advocacy, and it includes some of the biggest names in corporate America, including Boeing, Exxon Mobil, and Blue Cross Blue Shield. [read post]
2 Feb 2016, 7:22 am
Exxon Mobil Corporation – United States District Court – Eastern District of Louisiana – February 1st, 2016 – This is a personal injury case involving a shrimp boat hitting a pipe to a well. [read post]
1 Feb 2016, 11:27 am
Platinum sponsors — $10,000 — Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP; Andrews Kurth LLP; Anonymous; Baker Botts LLP; DBA Corporate Counsel Section; Deans & Lyons LLP; Dykema Cox Smith; Exxon Mobil Corporation; Fish & Richards, PC; W. [read post]
29 Jan 2016, 3:00 am
Robertson v Exxon Mobil Corp., 2015 WL 9592499 (5th Cir. [read post]
