Search for: "FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE V US" Results 321 - 340 of 561
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Apr 2012, 6:39 am by Rick Pildes
But consider the range of national and state legislation and presidential action the Court held unconstitutional in one 17-month period starting in January, 1935: the NIRA, both its Codes of Fair Competition and the president's power to control the flow of contraband oil across state lines; the Railroad Retirement Act; the Frazier-Lemke Farm Mortgage Moratorium Act; the effort of the president to get the administrative agencies to reflect his political vision (Humphrey's… [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 9:07 am by Mandelman
Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, et al and Selkowitz v. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 5:38 am by Simmons & Schiavo
Federal National Mortgage Association, also known as Fannie Mae, are two documents borrowers sign to get a home loan. [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 3:41 pm by Richard Frank
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit from last December’s federal district court decision in Rocky Mountain Farmers Union v. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 12:33 am by Kevin LaCroix
Other settlements include the following: Merrill Lynch Mortgage Backed Securities, $315 million (refer here); Lehman Brothers offering underwriters settlement, $417 million (refer here); Washington Mutual, $208.5 million (refer here); Wells Fargo Mortgage Backed Securities, $125 million (refer here); National City, $168 Million (refer here); Colonial Bank, $10.5 million (refer here); and Lehman Brothers executives, $90 million (refer here) and E*Trade, $79 million (refer… [read post]
1 Jan 2012, 7:34 pm by Kelly Phillips Erb
Mortgage interest limits (well, I don’t agree with that subsidy, but whatever). [read post]
21 Dec 2011, 12:40 am by Kevin LaCroix
  A 1987 New York Court of Appeals decision, CPC International, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 9:25 am by Lyle Denniston
Treasury Department — method that federal employees are to use to claim that they were fired in violation of their constitutional rights 10-9995 — Wood v. [read post]